Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhavneshwari Devi vs Of
2024 Latest Caselaw 27 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27 HP
Judgement Date : 1 January, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Bhavneshwari Devi vs Of on 1 January, 2024

Author: Virender Singh

Bench: Virender Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. MP (M) No.3213 of 2023

.

                                                     Reserved on : 28.12.2023





                                                     Reserved on : 01.01.2024
    Bhavneshwari Devi                                                        ...Applicant





                                              Versus




                                                   of
    State of Himachal Pradesh                                             ...Respondent

    Coram
                         rt

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1

For the applicant : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Narender Kumar Reddy, Advocate.

For the respondent : Mr. Tejasvi Sharma & Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocates

General.

Virender Singh, Judge

Applicant­Bhavneshwari Devi, apprehending

her arrest, in FIR No.97/23, dated 22.12.2023, registered

under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter

referred to as 'the IPC') with Police Station, Janjehli,

District Mandi, H.P., has filed the present application,

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

(hereinafter referred to as 'CrPC').

.

2. By way of the present application, the

indulgence of this Court has been sought to direct the

I.O./police of Police Station Janjehli, to release the

applicant on bail, in the event of her arrest, in the above

of noted case.

3. According to the applicant, she is an innocent rt person and having deep roots in the society

4. The applicant is apprehending her arrest in the

FIR, in question, which, according to her, is totally false,

fabricated and without any basis.

5. According to the applicant, on 22.12.2023, she

was busy with her household chores affairs, when,

someone had called her on the pretext that a person, had

fallen nearby her house. Immediately, she rushed to the

spot, where, she found number of persons gathered there,

including the younger brother and sister of the deceased.

6. It is the further case of the applicant that the

brother and sister of the deceased took him to Civil

Hospital Bagsiad. Thereafter, someone told the applicant

that the said person has passed away. On the next

morning, she came to know that the FIR, in question, has

.

been registered against her.

7. On the basis of the above facts, learned counsel

for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, on behalf

of the applicant, for which, she is ready to abide by, in

of case, any direction is issued to the Police/Investigating

Officer, under Section 438 Cr.PC.

rt

8. Learned counsel for the applicant has also

placed on record the documents, showing that deceased

Kunji Lal and complainant Hem Singh were casting their

votes in Room No.2, Government Senior Secondary School,

Village Sangalwara, Post Office Janjehali, Tehsil Thunag,

District Mandi, H.P.

9. When put to notice, the police has filed the

status report, disclosing therein that on 22.12.2023,

complainant Hem Singh, son of Shri Ganga Ram, moved a

complaint against the applicant before I.O., Police Station,

Janjehli, mentioning therein that his elder brother Kunji

Lal was opening the door of the room, then, from the shop

Bhavneshwari Devi (applicant) came near the door and

gave push to his brother and told that why he is opening

the door.

.

9.1. Due to the push given by the applicant, Kunji

Lal, fell down on the floor, upon which, complainant

objected to, by saying as to why she has given push to him

as he is a heart patient. His brother become unconscious

of and due to the fall, he has expired.

9.2. Lastly, the complainant has got recorded that rt accused was knowing the fact that the deceased was heart

patient and she has intentionally given push to him.

10. Kunji Lal was thereafter taken to Bagsiad Civil

Hospital, where, he was declared dead.

11. On the basis of the above facts, the police has

registered the FIR, in question.

12. After registration of the FIR, the police has

conducted the investigation. The dead body of the

deceased was sent for postmortem examination to Medical

College, Ner Chowk.

13. During investigation, on the basis of the

documents produced by the nephew of the deceased, it was

found that his angiography was conducted on 5.12.2023.

Kunji Lal was admitted in Civil Hospital Janjehali, with the

history of chest pain. Thereafter, he was admitted in

.

Medical College, Ner Chowk, on 5.12.2023. On the same

day, he was taken to Heart Institute Mandav Gutkar,

Mandi, where, after angiography, stunting was done. Kunji

Lal remained admit till 7.12.2023. Thereafter, he came

of back to his home at Janjehli.

14. On 14.12.2023, Kunji Lal was again called for rt medical check up. On that day, after medical examination,

he was again requested to come for follow up on 4.1.2024.

It has also been found that on 22.12.2023, Kunji Lal and

his brother Hem Singh, had gone to the house of Sant Ram

to mourn the death of his brother.

15. While coming back, Kunji Lal has opened the

lock of the door of his old house at Bus Stand Shikawari,

then, Bhavneshwari Devi (applicant), had immediately

come there from her shop and given a push to Kunji Lal

and said that the house does not belong to his father.

Kunji Lal became unconscious and thereafter, he was

taken to Hospital, where, he has been declared dead.

16. It has been mentioned in the status report that

applicant is real sister­in­law (Bhabhi) of deceased Kunji

.

Lal and was aware about the fact that stunt has been

inserted in his heart, as such, with the intention to kill

him, she had given push to him. Due to the said fact,

Kunji Lal expired.

of

17. Lastly, it has been apprehended that in case,

any direction is issued, under Section 438 Cr.PC, she may rt coerce the witnesses and also affect the investigation, as

she is very clever person.

18. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has

been made to dismiss the application.

19. In the bail application, the applicant has given

her address, as resident of Village and Post Office

Shikawari, Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi. In the status

report, the address of complainant Hem Singh, who is

younger brother of deceased Kunji Lal, has been shown as

resident of VPO Shikawari.

20. In the status report, it has specifically been

mentioned that Kunji Lal was having his old house at Bus

Stand Shikawari, which is adjacent to the shop of the

applicant.

.

21. Considering the stand of the police, according to

which, the applicant is not stranger, but, real sister­in­law

of Kunji Lal and deceased Kunji Lal was admitted at Civil

Hospital Janjehali, on account of chest pain on 5.12.2023,

of from where, he was referred to Medical College, Ner Chowk,

thereafter, he was taken to Heart Institute Mandav Gutkar, rt District Mandi, where, stunting was done, this Court is of

the view that the police has every right to investigate the

matter and in case, any direction is issued, certainly, the

police will not be able to find the truth.

22. The investigation is at the initial stage and in

case, any direction is issued under Section 438 Cr.PC, it

would be nothing, but, interference in the investigation of

the case, which is not permissible under the Law.

23. So far as the documents, which have been

placed on record by learned counsel for the applicant, are

concerned, from these two documents, one thing is clear

that Kunji Lal and Hem Singh had cast their votes in room

No.2,Government Senior Secondary School, Village

Sangalwara, Post Office Janjehali, Tehsil Thunag, District

Mandi, H.P. These documents seem to have been placed

.

on record, with a view to demonstrate that Kunji Lal and

Hem Singh were not residents of Shikawari, but, nothing

could be made out from the documents, except that they

were casting their votes at the Polling Booth, as mentioned

of in these documents.

24. Considering all these facts, the applicant is not rt able to make out a case for issuance of any direction under

Section 438 Cr.PC., and the application is accordingly

dismissed.

25. Any of the observations, made hereinabove,

shall not be taken as an expression of opinion, on the

merits of the case, as these observations, are confined,

only, to the disposal of the present bail application.

( Virender Singh ) Judge January 01, 2024(ps)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter