Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15258 HP
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CrMPs(M) No. 2415 to 2417 of 2023
.
Decided on : 04.10.2023
CrMP (M) No. 2415 of 2023
Kaka Deen @ Rana Deen ...Applicant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent
........................................................................................
CrMP (M) No. 2416 of 2023
Billu @ Jakub Deen
r ...Applicant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent
........................................................................................
CrMP (M) No. 2417 of 2023
Saleem Khan ...Applicant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the applicant(s) : Mr. Ashok Chaudhary,
Advocate.
For the respondent(s) : Mr. Mohinder Zharaick, Mr.
Tejasvi Sharma and Mr. H.S.
1
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
::: Downloaded on - 04/10/2023 20:37:13 :::CIS
2
Rawat, Additional Advocates
General.
.
Virender Singh, Judge. (Oral)
The above-titled bail applications are being
disposed of by the common order, as, all the three bail
applications have been filed, in the same case, i.e. FIR
No. 109 of 2023, dated 30th July, 2023, registered under
Sections 366, 342, 506, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal
Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC'), with Police Station
Aut, District Mandi, H.P.
2. By way of these bail applications, filed under
Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
(hereinafter referred to as 'CrPC'), applicants-Kaka Deen
@ Rana Deen, Billu @ Jakub Deen and Saleem Khan
have sought the indulgence of this Court, to issue
direction to the Investigating Officer/police of Police
Station, Aut, District Mandi, H.P., to release them on
bail, in the event of their arrest, in the above-noted FIR,
as, they are apprehending their arrest, in the said case.
3. According to the applicants, they are innocent
persons and have nothing to do with the alleged offences,
.
for which, they have been named as accused persons.
4. As per the applicants, they belong to a
respectable and reputed family and are having deep
roots in the society.
5. It is the stand of the applicants that they have
falsely been roped in, in the present case, as nothing
incriminating has been recovered or has to be recovered
from their custody.
6. According to the applicants, they are ready to
abide by any condition(s), to be imposed by this Court, in
case, any direction is issued to the police/Investigating
Officer, under Section 438 CrPC.
7. The applicants have earlier tried their luck, by
moving similar bail applications, before the Court of
learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Mandi, District
Mandi, however, the said applications were dismissed on
14th August, 2023.
8. Apart from this, it has also been argued by the
learned counsel appearing for the applicants that their co-
accused, namely Roshan Deen and Bano Bibi @ Vani, have
already been released on bail, by the Court of learned
.
Sessions Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, on 26 th September,
2023.
9. On the basis of the above facts, the applicants
have sought the relief, as claimed, in the bail applications.
10. When, put to notice, the State has filed the
status report, on 22nd September, 2023, disclosing therein,
that on 25th July, 2023, the father of the victim appeared
before the police of Police Station Aut and moved a
complaint, disclosing therein, that the victim had left the
home without informing anyone. According to him, the
victim, aged about 19 years, had gone to learn tailoring
skill, on 25th July, 2023, to Nagwain and did not return
back. She was searched, but, was not found. As such, he
has requested the police to take the action.
10.1. It has been mentioned in the status report that
on 30th July, 2023, the victim was brought to Police
Station, who was found at Talwara, Punjab. In her
statement, recorded under Section 154 CrPC, the victim
has disclosed that as usual, she had gone to learn tailoring
skills and at about 05.30 p.m., she was returning back to
her home. Meanwhile, one car came there and the driver
.
stopped the same near her. The person, who was sitting
by the side of the driver, has told her that he is her uncle
Roshan. According to her, said Roshan requested her to
sit in the vehicle, as, they were also going to the village. In
the vehicle, four men and two women were sitting. All the
said persons had covered their faces with scarves.
10.2. When, the victim had alighted from the vehicle,
one lady had put handkerchief on the mouth of the victim,
due to which, she became unconscious. When, she
regained consciousness, she could not find as to where she
was. On the way, the vehicle was stopped at a dhaba,
where, food was provided to her. Thereafter, she was taken
to a house, where, she was confined in a room for two
days. During that period, nothing untoward had happened
with her. On 28th July, 2023, they took her in the vehicle
and apprised the victim that they would solemnize her
Nikkah with a boy. When, she refused, she was
threatened.
10.3. As per the victim, when, the vehicle reached at
a market, then, the victim had requested them to go to
.
washroom, in order to respond to the call of nature. One
woman was standing by her and another was watching the
car. Thereafter, the victim ran from there, after pushing
the woman and taking lift in a car. She alighted down
from the car after crossing the market. On the way, she
noticed one shop of tailor, where, 2-3 women were sitting.
She requested them to provide phone and she had made a
call to her mother. In the meanwhile, the women sitting
the tailor shop, had called the police and the police took
her to Police Station Talwara.
10.4. As per the status report, the victim had
disclosed the names of the persons, who had kidnapped
her, as Roshan Deen, Saleem (applicant in CrMP (M) No.
2417 of 2023), Billu (applicant in CrMP (M) No. 2416 of
2023), Kaka (applicant in CrMP (M) No. 2415 of 2023) and
Bani, however, she was not aware about the name of the
another lady.
10.5. On the basis of the above facts, FIR was
registered and investigation was entrusted to ASI Alamgir.
The victim was medico-legally examined at RH, Kullu. On
31st July, 2023, the statement of the victim was got
.
recorded, under Section 161 CrPC. The spot was visited
and the spot map was prepared.
10.6. As per the status report, on 16th September,
2023, accused-Roshan Deen was associated in the
investigation of the case and was, later on, arrested. On
19th September, 2023, accused-Bano Bibi @ Vani was
arrested. Both of them have been released on bail.
10.7. It is the further case of the police that during
the investigation, accused-Roshan Deen and Bano Bibi had
disclosed that the vehicle used by them was of applicant-
Kaka Deen @ Rana Deen and the substance to make the
victim unconscious, was provided by Haleema, wife of
applicant-Kaka Deen @ Rana Deen. The room, where, the
victim was locked, is in the know of applicant-Kaka Deen @
Rana Deen.
11. After perusing the said status report, interim
protection was granted to the applicants and they were
directed to join the investigation, by directing the
Investigating Officer to release them, on bail, in the event of
their arrest, in the above-mentioned FIR.
.
12. Consequently, all the three applicants have
joined the investigation on 23rd to 26th September, 2023,
30th September, 2023 and 1st October, 2023. Since, the
accused persons could not disclose about the vehicle used,
as well as, the substance used to make the victim
unconscious, as such, Section 201 IPC was added, in this
case.
13. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has
been made to dismiss the bail applications.
14. Heard.
15. The role allegedly played by the applicants, in
the commission of the alleged offences, will be proved
during the course of the trial. The accused persons
(applicants) are presumed to be innocent till the conclusion
of the trial and the bail applications cannot be rejected as a
matter of punishment, as, pre-trial punishment is
prohibited under the law.
16. The applicants have joined the investigation, as
directed by this Court and their custodial interrogation is
not required, as, no such request has been made in the
status report. Mere mentioning of the fact that the
.
applicants are not getting the recoveries affected, does not
mean that their custodial interrogation is required by the
police.
17. No other criminal history of the applicants has
been mentioned in the status report, nor, it has been
argued by the learned Additional Advocate General, during
the course of the arguments.
18. The chances of commencement and conclusion
of the trial, against the applicants, are not so bright, as
such, no useful purpose would be served, by dismissing
the bail applications, which would result into their remand
to the police custody or to the judicial custody.
19. Considering the facts that the applicants have
joined the investigation and the police is not able to make
out a case for custodial interrogation of the applicants, this
Court is of the view that the interim orders, dated 22nd
September, 2023, passed in all the three cases, are liable
to be made absolute.
20. Consequently, interim orders, dated 22nd
September, 2023, are made absolute. Therefore, it is
.
ordered that the applicants be released on bail, in the
event of their arrest, in case FIR No. 109 of 2023, dated
30th July, 2023, registered under Sections 366, 342, 506,
201 and 34 IPC, with Police Station Aut, District Mandi,
H.P. on their furnishing personal bonds, to the tune of
₹ 50,000/- each, with one surety each of the like amount,
to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. The bail is
granted, subject to the following conditions:
a) That the applicants will join the investigation of the case, as and when, called for, by the
Investigating Officer, in accordance with law;
b) That the applicants will not leave India, without
prior permission of the Court;
c) That the applicants will not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him/her from
disclosing such facts to the Investigating Officer or the Court; and
d) That the applicants shall regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so seek exemption from appearance by filing appropriate application;
21. Any of the observations, made hereinabove,
shall not be taken as an expression of opinion, on the
merits of the case, as, these observations, are confined,
only, to the disposal of the present bail applications.
.
22. The applicants are directed to move regular bail
applications, when, charge sheet will be filed in the
Competent Court of Law.
23. It is made clear that the respondent-State is at
liberty to move an appropriate application(s), in case, any
of the bail conditions, is found to be violated by the
applicants.
( Virender Singh ) Judge
October 04, 2023 ( rajni )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!