Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Of Sh. R.M. Upadhyaya vs Deepak
2022 Latest Caselaw 3256 HP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3256 HP
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2022

Himachal Pradesh High Court
Of Sh. R.M. Upadhyaya vs Deepak on 11 May, 2022
Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel
                                1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
                 ON THE 11th DAY OF MAY, 2022

                            BEFORE




                                                           .

           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL


                  CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (MAIN) U/S 482 CRPC





                  No. 520 of 2019

     Between:-
     SANDEEP UPADHYAYA, SON




     OF SH. R.M. UPADHYAYA,
     RESIDENT OF PLOT NO. 3,
     BLOCK NO. 16, HOUSING
     BOARD COLONY, CHHOTA
     SHIMLA.

                                                  ...PETITIONER

     (BY SHRI KUL BHUSHAN KHAJURIA,
     ADVOCATE)


     AND

1.   MANOJ JOSHI, SON OF SH.
     K.K. JOSHI, RESIDENT OF




     HOUSE NO. 287/12, NAHAN,
     DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P.





                                                ...RESPONDENT
2.   SH. DEEPAK DHIMAN, EDITOR
     (HIMACHAL),         DAINIK





     BHASKAR, HINDI DAILY, PLOT
     NO. 11-12, SECTOR 25-D,
     CHANDIGARH.

3.   SH. R.K. GUPTA (FOR M/S D.B.
     CORPORATION LTD.) PRINTER
     &     PUBLISHER,     DAINIK
     BHASKAR,     HINDI    DAILY,
     OPPOSITE     PWD     GUEST
     HOUSE, MALIKPUR, SIRHIND,




                                          ::: Downloaded on - 17/05/2022 20:04:45 :::CIS
                                        2

       DISTRICT FATEHGARH SAHIB,
       PUNJAB-140406.

4.     CITY REPORTER (NAME TO




                                                                     .
       THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE





       EDITOR), DAINIK BHASKAR,
       HINDI DAILY, NEAR MAJITHA
       HOUSE, SHIMLA-2, H.P.
                              ...PROFORMA RESPONDENTS





       (SHRI BIMAL GUPTA, SENIOR ADVOCATE,
       WITH M/S SATISH SHARMA & RAVI TANTA,
       ADVOCATES FOR R-1.





       SHRI M.A. KHAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE,
       WITH  MS.   HEM    KANTA KAUSHAL,
       ADVOCATE, FOR R-2 & 3).
       Whether approved for reporting? No.

__________________________________________________________

              This petition coming on for hearing this day, the Court passed the
following:-

                                  JUDGMENT

By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of proceedings

pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirmaur at

Nahan in Complaint No. 4817/2018, titled as Manoj Joshi Vs. Deepak

Dhiman and others.

2. The complaint, referred to hereinabove, has been filed by

complainant- Shri Manoj Joshi under Sections 500, 501 and 120-B of the

Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

the petitioner was not working for the newspaper concerned at the time

when the alleged news item was published. According to him, this stand of

the petitioner is good enough to allow the present petition filed under

Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the

.

complaint, which so stand initiated against him. Learned counsel has also

argued that otherwise also, after the service of notice upon the petitioner,

the case has been listed before the learned Court below on more than 25

occasions, but no progress is being made for want of service of

respondent No. 4 therein, which is causing unnecessary harassment to

the petitioner and on this count also, the present petition deserves to be

allowed.

3. Mr. Bimal Gupta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the

respondent/complainant -Manoj Joshi submits that the present petition is

completely mis-conceived, for the reason that the petitioner herein has

been rightly impleaded as an accused in the complaint and the allegations

which have been made by the complainant against the present petitioner

will be duly substantiated by him during the course of trial. He further

submitted that as far as the issue of service of respondent No. 4 is

concerned, the complainant has done all that was within his means to do

the needful, but as the particulars of the parties have not been disclosed

to the complainant by accused No. 2 and 3, it is for this reason that

service upon said respondent has not been effected till date.

4. On a query so put to learned counsel appearing for

respondents No. 2 and 3 by the Court, on instructions, learned Senior

Counsel appearing for the said respondents informed the Court that the

particulars of respondent No. 4 are as under:-

.

"Shri Ram Prashad, son of Shri Luiee Ram, resident

of Village Darkali, Rampur, Shimla, H.P."

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having

perused the petition as well as the documents appended therewith, this

Court is of the considered view that this is not a fit case wherein the Court

can exercise its inherent powers so vested in it under Section 482 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure and quash the proceedings initiated against

the present petitioner by respondent No. 1. However, this Court is not

giving any opinion with regard to the merit of the complaint which has

been filed by the complainant, but all that the Court is observing, is that

the complaint has to be adjudicated by the learned Trial Court on its own

merit and, but natural, petitioner herein is at liberty to take such defence,

as is available to him to prove his innocence before the learned Trial Court

and in case he is acquitted, then he can always have resort to such

remedies as are available in law, against the complainant.

6. As far as the issue of the matter being delayed before the

learned Trial Court on account of non-service of respondent No. 4 therein,

whose particulars were not disclosed in the Complaint before the learned

Court below is concerned, the undertaking given by learned Instructing

Counsel for the complainant is taken on record that now steps will be

taken for the service of said respondent before the learned Trial Court

within one week as from the date when the matter shall be first listed

.

hereinafter before the learned Trial Court, in terms of the identity of the

said party, so disclosed today by respondents No. 2 and 3. The petition,

therefore, is closed without adjudication on merit, but with the observation

that the learned Trial Court may make an endeavour to complete the trial

as expeditiously as possible, subject to necessary assistance being

rendered to it by the parties. The petitioner as well as respondents No. 1

to 3 herein through their learned counsel are directed to appear before the

learned Trial Court on 23rd May, 2022. On the said date, learned Trial

Court shall fix a date for the service of respondent No. 4 therein, on an

application which will be filed on the said date itself by the complainant

therein, mentioning therein the particulars of respondent No. 4 and also

incorporating the same in the main case. Miscellaneous applications, if

any, also stand disposed of.

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge

May 11, 2022 (bhupender)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter