Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2322 HP
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RP No. 94 of 2017
.
Date of decision: 19.03.2021
National Insurance Co. Ltd. ...Petitioner/respondent No. 3
Versus
Satya Parkash Sharma & Ors. .....Respondents
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
No.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner/
Respondent No. 3.
r Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate.
For respondents: Mr. Narain Singh Shandil, Advocate,
for respondents No. 1 to 4.
Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for
respondent No. 5.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
It is not in dispute that the name of the Counsel
representing the Insurance Company i.e. petitioner herein was
not reflected in the Cause List on the date when the case was
finally decided by this Court on 18.12.2015.
2. It is further not in dispute that the Counsel had filed
his power of attorney on 24.06.2009 whereas the judgment was
passed much on 18.12.2015. This in itself is a sufficient ground
to review/recall the judgment in question as the petitioner was
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
not afforded any opportunity of hearing whatsoever. Ordered
accordingly.
.
3. The judgment passed in FAO No. 30 of 2009 dated
18.12.2015 is ordered to be recalled/reviewed.
4. The FAO No. 30 of 2009 is ordered to be restored to
its original number. List for hearing on 08.04.2021.
5. The petition stands disposed of so also pending
applications, if any.
19.03.2021
(sanjeev)
r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!