Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2238 HP
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2021
RSA No. 591 of 2019-C
.
17.03.2021 Present: Mr. G.R.Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondents No.1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13 & 14.
Respondents No.2 and 8 expired.
None for respondents No.9 and 11.
RSA No.591 of 2019
Respondents No.9 and 11 have been duly served in
September 2020, however, till date they have not chosen to be
represented in this appeal. Hence, they are proceeded ex-
parte.
From memo of parties of the main judgment, it is
evident that on account of death of respondent No.8 Surto, her
name was deleted from array of respondents. Hence, there is
no need to take steps for her substitution in this appeal, rather
her status is to be reflected correctly in memo of parties by
filing an amended memo.
Needful be done within a week.
CMP(M) Nos. 476 and 477 of 2020
Notice to proposed respondents/legal
representatives of deceased respondent No.2-Guman Singh
mentioned in para 1 of CMP(M) No.476 of 2020 as 2(a) to 2(e),
returnable on 17.05.2021, be issued on taking steps within five
days.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge March 17, 2021 (Purohit)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!