Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishnubhai Melabhai Thakor vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1465 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1465 Guj
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Vishnubhai Melabhai Thakor vs State Of Gujarat on 20 March, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/6665/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

                                                                                                            undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                           R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 6665 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                               VISHNUBHAI MELABHAI THAKOR
                                                          Versus
                                                    STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR ADITYA JADEJA, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                      No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                          Date : 20/03/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Jigar Patel for learned

advocate Mr.Ashish Dagli appearing on behalf of the applicant

and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.Aditya Jadeja

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of

the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for

enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR

being C.R. No. 11192061260124/2026 registered with

Viramgam Town Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offence

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6665/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 54 of

the BNS.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on

regular bail. It is further submitted that no useful purpose

would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite

period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and

willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by

this Court if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP

has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and the

role attributed to the present applicant, this Court may not

exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of

the respective parties and perused the papers. Following

aspects are considered:-

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6665/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

i. The allegation being as regards offence punishable

under Section 109(1) of the BNS etc.

ii. The allegation for offence punishable under Section

109(1) being against the co-accused - Rahul who is alleged

to have inflicted knife injuries.

iii. The present applicant not being attributed any particular

role except for scuffling with the complainant party more

particularly it appears, as per the FIR, that the present

applicant has been called by his brother informing that the

co-accused having an altercation and whereas, prma facie,

it would appear that the applicant had reached there to

help his younger brother.

iv. The fact of the applicant being in custody since

05.03.2026 and not having any antecedents.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in

[2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against the

applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6665/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion

that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the

applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant

is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R.

registered as C.R. No. 11192061260124/2026 registered with

Viramgam Town Police Station, Ahmedabad, on executing a

bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one

surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court

and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a

week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission

of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and

also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and

shall not change the residence without prior intimation to

the I.O.;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6665/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

[f] not to enter Taluka:Viramgam till the charge-sheet is

filed.

[g] mark presence once a month for a period of six months

after the charge-sheet is filed before the concerned police

station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time

being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed,

the Sessions Court concerned will be free to take appropriate

action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned

Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above

conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of

considering the application of the applicant for being released

on regular bail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6665/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) Bhoomi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter