Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vikram Shivshankar Vishwanath Mandal vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1429 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1429 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Vikram Shivshankar Vishwanath Mandal vs State Of Gujarat on 18 March, 2026

                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/284/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 284 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                      VIKRAM SHIVSHANKAR VISHWANATH MANDAL
                                                       Versus
                                                 STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR GAJENDRA P BAGHEL(2968) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                              DESAI

                                                          Date : 18/03/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. G. P. Baghel appearing on behalf

of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Krutik

Parikh appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R.

No.11210062250049 of 2025 registered with Cybercrime Police

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/284/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

Station, District Surat for the offence punishable under Sections

318(4), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 61(2), 3(5) and 340(2) of the BNS, 2023

as well as under Setions 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information

Technology Aemdment Act, 2008.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the

allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It

is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed, further

incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the Investigation

Officer in any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be

imposed by this Court, if released on bail. Learned advocate upon

instructions has also submitted that, the applicant shall not leave

the State of Gujarat, till the trial is over.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to

the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/284/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not

exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The applicant though is a resident of Jarkhand State, he shall

be available at the time of trial;

ii. The are no criminal antecedents against the applicant;

iii. The allegation against the applicant pertains to he having

paid Rs.123.71/-paisa to purchase the domaine Go-Daddy, which

was used for generating APK file of traffic challan, which was

used to defraud people to pay amounts.

iv. Out of the total defrauded amount of Rs.7,54,000/-, the

amount of Rs.4,50,000/- has been recovered.;

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/284/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central

Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise

the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No.11210062250049 of 2025 registered with Cybercrime

Police Station, District Surat, on executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one local

surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and

subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/284/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the local limits of Surat district without prior

permission of the Competent Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and to

the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and the

court;

[f] mark his presence on once a week before the concerned

police station till the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for which,

he shall file affidavits before the concerned court and the police

station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If

breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions

Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/284/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court

to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in

accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) KAJAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter