Ultratech Cement Ltd. Rmc Division Thro ... vs Shree Construction Thro Brijesh Golani
2026 Latest Caselaw 1177 Guj

Gujarat High Court

Ultratech Cement Ltd. Rmc Division Thro ... vs Shree Construction Thro Brijesh Golani on 13 March, 2026

                                                                                                                       NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.MA/14089/2024                                         ORDER DATED: 13/03/2026

                                                                                                                       undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 14089
                                                   of 2024

                                                    In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/19988/2024

                                                             With
                                               F/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 19988 of 2024
                        ==========================================================
                             ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. RMC DIVISION THRO ANAND SEVAKDAS
                                                     SHAH
                                                     Versus
                                 SHREE CONSTRUCTION THRO BRIJESH GOLANI & ORS.
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        AKASH N SHAH(10130) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR DEVANSH N KAKKAD(12134) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
                        MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 3
                        ==========================================================

                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                               Date : 13/03/2026

                                                                ORAL ORDER

1. This application is filed under Section 419(4) of

the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ('BNSS' for

short) by the Complainant seeking leave to appeal to

challenge the judgment and order impugned passed by the

learned trial Court, whereby the Ld. Trial Court had

acquitted the Respondent/s-Accused of charge under Section

138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter

referred to as the `NI Act' for short).

2. Learned advocate for the appellant seeks

permission to withdraw this application, in view of the latest

decision rendered by this Court in the case of Shivsinh

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14089/2024 ORDER DATED: 13/03/2026

undefined

Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s State of Gujarat & Anr. being

Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on 23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, more

particularly, the judgment in the matter of M/s Celestium

Financial V/s A.Gyanasekaran etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804, has observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim,

has a specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of

the Code (Section 413 of BNSS) to the Court which is

immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court,

with a liberty to file appropriate appeal under Section 372 of

the Code (Section 413 of BNSS) and prayed that the period

that may be consumed in filing the present appeal, may not

be counted as delay in filing such appeal before the concerned Court.

3. Permission as prayed for is granted. The present

application as well as the connected appeal are disposed of

as withdrawn, with a liberty to file appropriate appeal/s

before the concerned Court, within a period of four months

from the date of this order. Record and proceedings, if lying

with this Court, be remitted back to the concerned Court

forthwith.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14089/2024 ORDER DATED: 13/03/2026

undefined

4. It is clarified that the period that may be

consumed in filing the present appeal may not be counted as

delay in filing such appeal before the concerned Court.

Moreover, the certified copy of the impugned judgment, be

handed over to the applicant/appellant, as per Rules, if asked

for. It is open for the parties to agitate all the grievance

before the concerned Court afresh.

5. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into

the merits of the matter at this stage.

(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J) M.H. DAVE