Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6954 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.A/798/2014 ORDER DATED: 25/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (FOR ENHANCEMENT) NO. 798 of 2014
================================================================
STATE OF GUJARAT - THRO' HARSHABEN B PATEL, FOOD INSPECTOR
Versus
ALTAFALI GULAMHUSEN PANWALA & ORS.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR ROHANKUMAR RAVAL, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Appellant(s) No. 1
MR DK MODI(1317) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5
MR MD MODI(1318) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5
RULE SERVED BY DS for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 25/09/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. A report has been placed by the Registry in context of
the order dated 15.07.2025 stating that the present
Appeal has been filed by the State for enhancement,
the same is still pending for admission and the record
and proceedings have been sent back to the trial Court
on 15.07.2015.
2. The Report of the Registry on verification, states that
Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2014 which was pending
before the Sessions Court, Sabarkantha was disposed
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.A/798/2014 ORDER DATED: 25/09/2025
undefined
of by a judgment dated 30.07.2024 by the learned 4 th
Additional District Judge, Sabarkantha @ Idar; a copy
of the online status states about the disposal of the
matter alongwith a copy of the judgment in Criminal
Appeal No.28 of 2014, where the appeal of the accused
No.2 to 5 who were the appellants before the Court at
Idar came to be allowed and the conviction under the
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 came to be
set aside and all the appellants were acquitted.
3. Learned advocate Mr. D.K. Modi for the respondent/s
submitted that in view of the acquittal judgment, the
present Appeal preferred by the State for enhancement
of sentence would become infructuous.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Rohankumar
Raval on perusing the judgment dated 30.07.2024 of
the learned 4th Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Sabarkantha at Idar submitted that the Appeal would
not survive. However, a request is made for reserving
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.A/798/2014 ORDER DATED: 25/09/2025
undefined
a liberty after necessary legal advice if the process
could be initiated.
5. In view of Report of the Registry and the statement
made by learned advocate Mr. D.K. Modi for the
respondents and on perusal of the order of acquittal in
Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2014 where the present
respondents as appellants came to be acquitted and
now, when no conviction and sentence lies against
them, the prayer for enhancement of sentence would
not survive. Hence, the present Criminal Revision
Application stands disposed of infructuous, with the
liberty reserved in favour of the State as prayed for.
Sd/-
(GITA GOPI, J) CAROLINE / SB-1 # 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!