Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7493 Guj
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/13671/2025 ORDER DATED: 14/10/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY)
NO. 13671 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14790 of 2025
With
F/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14790 of 2025
==========================================================
USHABEN W/O. MAHESHBHAI BEHCHARBHAI PARMAR AND D/O.
BHAGUBHAI LAKHABHAI PARMAR
Versus
ANILBHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
VASIMRAJA A KURESHI(8609) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
FRESH NOTICE SERVED(4512) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS. KRINA CALLA ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH
ROY
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. M. VYAS
Date : 14/10/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY)
1) This application under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act is filed seeking condonation of
delay of 119 days in preferring appeal against
judgment of acquittal.
2) Heard learned Counsel for the applicant
Mr.M.M. Bukhari for V.A. Kureshi and Ms Krina
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/13671/2025 ORDER DATED: 14/10/2025
undefined
Calla learned APP for respondent no. 2 State.
Despite service of notice on respondent no. 1
none appeared. Thus, this application is not
opposed by the respondent no. 1.
3) Respondent no.1 was prosecuted for the
offenses punishable under Section 376(2)(F)(N),
376(3), 506(2), 323 of IPC and under Section
4(2), 5(L)(N), 6, 12 of POCSO Act. After
conclusion of the trial, the respondent was
acquitted of all the said charges. Aggrieved
thereby, the mother of the prosecutrix being a
victim as defined under Section 2(wa) of Cr.P.C.
preferred an appeal challenging the said judgment
of the acquittal. There is a delay of 119 days in
preferring the appeal. Explaining the said delay,
it is stated that the appellant is an illiterate
lady and being oblivious of the procedure
prescribed for preferring an appeal and also due
to some communication gap in contacting her
advocate to prefer an appeal, this delay of 119
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/13671/2025 ORDER DATED: 14/10/2025
undefined
days took place in preferring the appeal. The
said explanation offered by the applicant in
explaining the said delay is not opposed,
controverted and denied by the first respondent
who did not contest the petition. Therefore, as
the appellant is a rustic woman and also an
illiterate woman and as it is stated that she
could not contact her advocate and is not aware
of the procedure in preferring the appeal, we are
of the considered view that the delay has been
satisfactorily explained. So, she is entitled for
condonation of the said delay to enable her to
pursue her appeal.
4) Resultantly, the application is allowed
condoning the delay of 119 days in preferring the
appeal.
(CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J)
(D. M. VYAS, J) YASH ARORA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!