Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7451 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/4217/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 4217 of
2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 23981 of 2025
==========================================================
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Versus
HURMANBHAI BACHUBHAI PARMAR & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MASUMI V NANAVATY(9321) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.HIREN M MODI(3732) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Date : 13/10/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application has been preferred for seeking
condonation of delay of 60 days caused in preferring the appeal
against the impugned judgment and award dated 07.02.2025
passed in M.A.C.P. No.316 of 2022.
2. Heard learned advocates for the parties.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the
delay of 60 days in preferring the appeal occurred owing to the
reasons that the necessary papers were sent from branch office
to head office of the Insurance Company for seeking the
permission to prefer the appeal, therefore, the applicant could
not prefer the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/4217/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2025
undefined
4. However, learned advocate Mr. Hiren M. Modi appearing on
behalf of the respondent no.2 submitted that considering the
facts and circumstances of the present case, the appropriate
order may be passed.
5. Considering the fact that the delay has occurred owing to
the transmission of the record from the branch office to the head
office and in conveying the necessary instructions for briefing, in
my view, the cause shown is sufficient to condone the delay.
Hence, the delay of 60 days caused in preferring the appeal is
hereby condoned. The present Civil Application stands allowed.
No order as to costs. The present application is disposed of.
6. Registry is directed to reflect the name of the learned
advocate Mr. Hiren M. Modi for respondent No.2 in the cause list
of the First Appeal.
(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) CDP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!