Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashishkumar Ratilal Soni vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 8071 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8071 Guj
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Ashishkumar Ratilal Soni vs State Of Gujarat on 19 November, 2025

                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/18899/2025                                 ORDER DATED: 19/11/2025

                                                                                                             undefined




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                          R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO.
                                                 18899 of 2025
                                                     With
                         CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2025
                               In R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 18899 of 2025
                      ==========================================================
                                                  ASHISHKUMAR RATILAL SONI
                                                            Versus
                                                   STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR. BHAUMIK P PATEL(7510) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS. KRINA CALLA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================
                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

                                                           Date : 19/11/2025
                                                            ORAL ORDER

Order in Criminal Misc. Application (for joining party) No. 1 of 2025:

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP Ms. Krina Calla waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent- State.

2. The present application has been filed by the applicant seeking impleadment of the heirs of the complainant.

3. Considering the averments made in the application, the present application for joining the heirs of the respondent no.2 -

complainant deserves consideration and the same is hereby allowed.

5. The applicant is permitted to join the respondents Nos.2.1 to 2.3 as necessary party in the captioned Criminal Misc. Application No. 18899 of 2025.

6. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/18899/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/11/2025

undefined

Order in Criminal Misc. Application No. 18899 of 2025

1. The amendment is allowed. The same shall be carried out forthwith.

2. Learned advocate Mr.Kaival Patel appears and submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondents nos.2.1 to 2.3 - complainant. He is permitted to file his appearance. Registry shall accept his vakalatnama.

3. By way of preferring the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant- accused seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying to quash and set-aside the order dated 16.06.2021 passed by the learned Principal Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Harij, in Criminal Case No.414 of 2013, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as well as all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto.

4. Today, when the matter is called out, the complainants, who are personally present before this Court, have produced their identity proof as well as the affidavits which are ordered to be taken on record. In the said affidavits, the complainants have categorically stated that they have received their dues and the dispute has been amicably resolved. The complainants have further stated that they have no grievance or ill-will against the applicant.

5. Considering the issue involved in the present application as well as considering the fact that the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, with the consent of learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the present application is taken up for final disposal.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/18899/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/11/2025

undefined

6. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned APP Ms.Krina Calla waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 - State and learned advocate Mr.Kaival Patel waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent nos.2.1 to 2.3 - complainant.

7. The complainants, who are personally present in the Court, have categorically stated before this Court that the dispute has been resolved and they have no objection if the application is allowed and the impugned order is quashed and set-aside.

8. The relevant paragraph of the respective affidavits reads thus :

" I further say and submit that there remains no grievance between me and the present petitioner for the alleged offence and I no longer wish that the petitioner faces any incarceration, I voluntarily give my consent without any force or coercion for the quashing of the said impugned judgment and order at Annexure -A".

9. Thus, it appears from the aforesaid that to continue further with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned order would be a futile exercise and the same would amount to abuse of process of law.

10. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the facts and circumstances arising out of the present application and taking into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another, reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2009) 1 GLH 31, Manoj Sharma vs. State & Others, reported in (2009) 1 GLH 190, and Narinder Singh & Others vs.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/18899/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/11/2025

undefined

State of Punjab & Another, reported in (2014) 2 Crime 67 (SC) as well as State of Haryana vs. Bhajanlal, reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, it appears that continuing further with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned order would be a futile exercise and the same would amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned order and all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are required to be quashed and set-aside in exercise of the powers conferred 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

11. In the result, the application is allowed. The order dated 16.06.2021 passed by the learned Principal Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Harij, in Criminal Case No.414 of 2013, for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as well as all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are hereby ordered to be quashed and set- aside qua the applicant.

12. Rule made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

13. In view of the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar [2025 INSC 1158], the applicant is directed to deposit 7.5 % of the cheque amount, by way of costs, with the District Legal Service Authority, Ahmedabad, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of this order.

(VIMAL K. VYAS, J) prk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter