Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krunal Mahendrabhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 65 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 65 Guj
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Krunal Mahendrabhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 2 May, 2025

                                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/17146/2019                             ORDER DATED: 02/05/2025

                                                                                                          undefined




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE
                                    FIR/ORDER) NO. 17146 of 2019
                                                With
                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 14476 of 2019
                       ==========================================================
                                                  KRUNAL MAHENDRABHAI PATEL
                                                             Versus
                                                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR HARDIK H DAVE(6295) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                       MR SOHAM JOSHI, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

                                                        Date : 02/05/2025
                                                      COMMON ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate Ms.Shradhdha Pipalia submits that she has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.2

- original complainant and she would file her Vakaltnama in the Registry. Registry to accept the same.

2. Rule. Learned advocate Ms.Pipalia waives service of Rule for respondent No.2 and learned APP Mr.Soham Joshi waives service of Rule for the respondent State.

3. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.

3.1 Considering the issue involved in the present applications and with consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the fact that the dispute amongst the petitioners and respondent - original complainant has been resolved amicably, both these matters are taken up for final disposal by this common order.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/17146/2019 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2025

undefined

4. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code"), the petitioners have prayed for quashing and setting aside FIR being C.R.No.I-113 of 2019 registered with Sector-7 Police Station, Dist. Gandhinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 506(2), 504 and 114 of the IPC and u/s 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR qua the petitioners herein.

5. Learned advocate Ms.Pipalia appearing for respondent No.2 submits that the amount of compensation received by the complainant shall be re-deposited in the concerned Department within fifteen days from today. If amount will not be deposited by the complainant in the concerned Department, learned APP would be at liberty to file appropriate application, if he so desires or the concerned Department may recover the said amount of compensation from the complainant by way of arrears of land revenue.

6. Learned counsel for the respective parties submitted that during pendency of the criminal proceedings, as referred to above, the parties have amicably settled their differences by way of mutual settlement and pursuant to understanding arrived at between them, affidavits are filed, which are taken on record. It is jointly submitted by learned advocates for the parties that parties have filed application under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act before learned Family Court and the matter is at the stage of pronouncement of judgment. It is expected from the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/17146/2019 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2025

undefined

learned Family Court to pronounce the judgment on next date. The complainant is present before the Court and she has stated that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and she has no objection if the questioned FIR is quashed. Learned advocate Ms.Pipalia submits that she has explained the contents of the affidavit in vernacular language Gujarati to the complainant. The relevant para of the affidavit filed in Criminal Misc. Application No.17146 of 2019 are as under :

"1. I am residing at the address mentioned herein above. I state and submit that I had registered an FIR being C.R. No - I - 113 of 2019 with Gandhinagar Sector -

7 Police Station, under sections 4981A), 506(2), 504 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3(R)(S) and 3(2)(5a) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2016.

2. I state and submit that the matter between the present petitioner and deponent has been amicably settled on account of intervention by elders, relatives, friends and well-wishers of the parties, and good people of society herein. Moreover, there is nothing left for either of us to proceed against anyone and therefore, above mentioned FIR being C.R. No - I - 113 of 2019 with Gandhinagar sector - 7 Police Station, under sections 498(A), 506(2), 504 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3(R)(S) and 3(2)(5a) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2016 and all the subsequent consequent proceedings initiated in pursuance of the same may be quashed and set aside.

3. I state and submit that, I have no objection if the FIR being C.R. No.I-113 of 2019 with Gandhinagar Sector - 7 Police Station, under sections 498(A), 506(2), 504 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3(R)(S) and 3(2) (5a) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2016 and all consequential proceedings in pursuance of the same are quashed and set aside with my consent.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/17146/2019 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2025

undefined

4. I state and submit that I have consented to the quashing of all proceedings in connection with the FIR being C.R. No - I - 113 of 2019 with Gandhinagar Sector - 7 Police Station, under sections 498(A), 506(2), 504 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3(R) (S) and 3 (2)(5a) ofthe Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2016 Code, including the quashing of the FIR itself, with my free will, consent and own without any undue influence, force, duress or threat from any person."

7. Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties, considering the facts and circumstances arising out of the present applications as well as taking into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC) as well as State of Haryana Vs. Bhajanlal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, it appears that further continuation of criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned FIR against the petitioners would be unnecessary harassment to the applicants. It appears that the trial would be futile and further continuance of the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR would amount to abuse of process of law and Court and hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned FIR and other consequential proceedings are required to be quashed and set aside in exercise of powers conferred under Section 482 of the Code.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/17146/2019 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2025

undefined

8. Resultantly, these applications are allowed. The impugned FIR being C.R.No.I-113 of 2019 registered with Sector-7 Police Station, Dist. Gandhinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 506(2), 504 and 114 of the IPC and u/s 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR qua the petitioner herein are quashed and set aside. Accordingly, Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(J. C. DOSHI, J) GAURAV J THAKER

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter