Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 367 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/MCA/1241/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/05/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR RECALL) NO.1241 of 2025
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 313 of 2025
=============================================
MAHUVA NAGAR PALIKA
Versus
BHAVNAGAR JILLA MAZDOOR SANGH & ORS.
=============================================
Appearance:
MS. SIDDHI VADODARIYA, ADVOCATE for
THAKKAR AND PAHWA ADVOCATES(1357) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KAUSHAL H. PATEL, ADVOCATE for
KARTIK H BHATT(9313) for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2,4,5
=============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 09/05/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA)
1. The present application has been filed seeking review and / or recall of the judgment and order dated 25.03.2025 passed in the captioned Letters Patent Appeal. The sole ground raised in the application is that, in the judgment dated 06.03.2018 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.1036 of 2016 and a group of connected matters, the Coordinate Bench of this Court had directed that the benefits be granted from the date of the award i.e. from 04.07.2015. However, in the present case, the directions were issued to grant the minimum pay-scale benefits from 01.12.2012, which is also from the date of the award. It is submitted that such a discrepancy could cause significant resentment amongst the employees, as senior employees may receive lesser amounts compared to their juniors, leading to potential heartburn and inequity.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/MCA/1241/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/05/2025
undefined
2. We do not subscribe to the submissions advanced by learned advocate Ms.Siddhi Vadodariya, appearing for the applicant.
3. In Letters Patent Appeal No.1036 of 2016 and allied matters, the Coordinate Bench vide judgment and order dated 06.03.2018, directed that the employees of the applicant - Nagarpalika to confer the benefit of regular pay-scale from the date of the award dated 04.07.2015. At the time of adjudication of the captioned appeal, no specific contention relating to the heart burning due to fixation of pay-scale has been raised by the applicant - Nagarpalika. On the contrary, the appeal was disposed of on the statement made by the Nagarpalika in the captioned Letters Patent Appeal, how can there be heart burning amongst the employees. We had adopted the similar directions to that of the Coordinate Bench. Hence, the applicant - Nagarpalika has to extend the benefit of regular pay-scale from the date of award, i.e. from 01.12.2012 as directed by us. The right of the respondent employee and the employees who were parties before the Coordinate Bench in the group of appeals has accrued from the respective awards.
4. Accordingly, the present review application stands rejected.
Sd/- .
(A. S. SUPEHIA, J)
Sd/- .
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
MAHESH/02
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!