Gujarat High Court
Hemant Jairaj Singh Shekhawat vs State Of Gujarat on 9 May, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/9756/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/05/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 9756 of 2025
(FOR CONSENT QUASHING)
=======================================================
HEMANT JAIRAJ SINGH SHEKHAWAT
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=======================================================
Appearance:
GAURAV K LAKHWANI(9520) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
NILESH P UDERNANI(9050) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS ASMITA PATEL APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR DHAIRYA PATEL for the Respondent No.2
=======================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Date : 09/05/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. With the consent of learned advocates appearing
for the parties, present application is taken up
for final disposal today.
2. Rule. Learned advocates appearing for the parties
waive service of notice of Rule.
3. By way of the present application under Section
528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
(for short, the 'BNSS'), the applicant prays for
quashing and setting aside the FIR being C.R.
No.I-31/2015 registered with Bopal Police Station,
Ahmedabad for the alleged offence and subsequent
proceedings pursuant to filing of the chargesheet.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/9756/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/05/2025
undefined
4. Heard learned advocate, Mr. Gaurav Lakhwani for
the applicant, learned APP Ms. Asmita Patel for
respondent no.1 and learned advocate, Mr. Dhairya
Patel for respondent no.2, who is permitted to
file his Vakalatnama in the Registry. I have also
heard the respondent no.2 - complainant, who is
present before this Court. Learned advocate, Mr.
Patel identifies respondent no.2 and confirms
correctness and genuineness of the affidavit filed
by her.
5. When the matter is called out, learned advocates
appearing for the parties have submitted that now
the dispute is amicably settled between the
parties and, therefore, the respondent no.2 has
filed an affidavit before this Court, copy of
which is placed on record at Page No.29. Upon
making inquiry, the respondent no.2, who is
present before this Court, has stated that she has
settled the dispute with the present applicant
and, therefore, if the impugned FIR is quashed,
she has no objection.
6. Therefore since now, the dispute with reference to
the impugned FIR is settled and resolved by and
between parties, which is confirmed by the
original complainant through her learned advocate,
the trial would be futile and any further
continuation of proceedings would amount to abuse
of process of law. In view of the above and in
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/9756/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/05/2025
undefined
view of the judgment in case of Gian Singh Vs.
State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC
303, Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab &
Anr., reported in 2014(2) Crime 67 (SC) and
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur
& Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat, recorded on Criminal
Appeal No.1723 of 2017 dated 04.10.2017, more
particularly, paragraph 15 thereof, the impugned
FIR is required to be quashed and set aside.
7. Resultantly, this application is allowed. The
impugned FIR being C.R. No.I-31/2015 registered
with Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad and all other
consequential proceedings arising out of said FIR
are hereby quashed and set aside.
8. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Direct service is permitted.
(DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.)
Gautam
