Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1094 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2774/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2774 of
2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 14446 of 2025
==========================================================
ZALA KRISHNABA GHANSHYAMSINH
Versus
KARANJI DHANAJI THAKOR & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 09/06/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Jainam Shah appearing for
Mr. Rathin P. Paval, learned advocate on record for the
applicant.
2. Issue Rule returnable forthwith.
3. Looking to the minimum number of days involved in
the present application seeking condonation of delay in
preferring the appeal, the present application is taken up for
final hearing in absence of the respondent.
4. Learned advocate at the outset has invited my attention
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2774/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
to the averments made in the application and has submitted
that the applicant - original claimant is mainly aggrieved by
the finding of negligency attributed to the present applicant
to the extent of 35% as according to him, the deceased was
not at all negligent in attributing to the accident. Learned
advocate has also invited my attention to the other grounds
raised in the appeal whereby he seeks enhancement of the
compensation. He has further invited my attention to the
averments made in the application and has submitted that
the applicants have good prima facie case. The delay of 41
days has crept in, in the process of pursuing the matter. He
has therefore urged this Court to take liberal view and to
condone the delay.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned
advocate for the applicant and looking to the averments made in the application, it transpires that the impugned judgment
and award came to be passed on 27.11.2024. The certified
copy of the same was applied on 17.12.2024 which was
received by the applicant on 03.01.2025. It is further stated
that the time was consumed in seeking necessary papers and
to arrange for legal expenses including the court fees.
6. Looking to the aforesaid explanation offered and the
challenge made in the captioned appeal in the opinion of this
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2774/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
Court there is no deliberate delay or gross negligency on the
part of the applicant in not pursuing the matter within the
prescribed period of limitation.
7. Taking the liberal view, the delay caused in preferring
the captioned appeal deserves consideration. Hence, the
present application seeking condonation of delay of 41 days
caused in preferring the captioned appeal is hereby allowed.
Rule is made absolute.
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) MAYA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!