Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1093 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/738/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 738 of
2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 21963 of 2024
==========================================================
HASMUKHBHAI KESHARBHAI CHAUDHARI
Versus
SUBHASHBHAI RAVANBHAI MEVADA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HIMANSU M PADHYA(1611) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 09/06/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard Mr. Himansu M. Padhya, learned advocate on
record for the applicant - original claimants.
2. Noticing the minimum number of days involved in the
present application seeking condonation of delay, the
application is taken up for final hearing in absence of the
respondents.
3. Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Harsh Shah,
learned AGP has appeared on advance copy on behalf of
respondent No.4 and waives service of notice of Rule on
behalf of the said respondent.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/738/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
4. Learned advocate Mr. Padhya appearing for the
applicant has invited my attention to the averments made in
the application and has submitted that the applicant is
aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 15.05.2024 passed
by the Tribunal whereby the claim petition preferred by the
applicant came to be dismissed.
5. Explaining delay, learned advocate has further submitted
that the applicant had immediately applied for certified copy
which was made available on 31.05.2024. He had further
explained that inadvertently at the stage of presenting the
appeal before this court the order passed below application
for indigent person preferred by the applicant before the
Tribunal, was not annexed. He had therefore applied for
certified copy of such application and the order passed
therein. In the process, the delay of 11 days had crept in, in filing the pauper application to prefer the appeal. He has
therefore urged to take liberal view and to condone the delay
caused in preferring the pauper application in moving the
appeal.
6. Considering the aforesaid explanation offered, in the
opinion of this court sufficient cause is made out to consider
the present application seeking condonation of delay of 11
days. The present application is therefore allowed. Rule is
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/738/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
made absolute. Civil Application stands disposed of.
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) MAYA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!