Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1089 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2782/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2782 of
2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 9311 of 2025
==========================================================
JASIBEN LAXMANBHAI CHARANIYA & ORS.
Versus
PRAVINBHAI LAXMANBHAI DABHI & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. HEMAL SHAH(6960) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 09/06/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard Mr. Sandeep Chavda, learned advocate
appearing on behalf of Mr. Hemal Shah, learned advocate on
record for the applicants - original claimants.
2. Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Looking to the
minimum number of days involved in preferring the appeal,
the present application is taken up for final hearing in
absence of the respondents.
3. At the outset, learned advocate has invited my attention
to the averments made in the application. Learned advocate
has submitted that the impugned judgment and award was
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2782/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2025
undefined
pronounced on 25.11.2024, thereafter the certified copy of the
judgment was applied for on 05.12.2024 which was delivered
on 12.12.2024. He has further pointed out that the applicants
were advised to approach in appeal. The applicants were
required to make arrangement for the Court fees. In the
process, the delay of 17 days has crept in preferring the
present appeal. By making aforesaid submission, learned
advocate has submitted that the applicants has good case on
merits and the delay resulted in approaching this court is
bonafide. Learned advocate has therefore urged this court to
condone the delay and to admit the appeal.
4. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned
advocate for the applicant and the averments made in the
application in the opinion of this court, sufficient cause is made out to consider the case for condonation of delay.
Hence delay caused in preferring the captioned appeal is
hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute.
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) MAYA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!