Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 925 Guj
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1833/2021 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1833 of 2021
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1841 of 2021
==========================================================
PATEL JASHVANTBHAI BHAGVANDAS
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HJ DHOLAKIA(5862) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS SRUSHTI A THULA(5014) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS NIRALI SARDA, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP for the
Respondent(s) No. 1 in SCA No.1833/2021
MR MITUL GAUTAM, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP for the
Respondent(s) No. 1 in SCA No.1841/2021
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 15/07/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Ms.Srushti Thula with learned
advocate Ms.Nasrin Shaikh appearing on behalf of the
petitioner.
2. Learned advocates would fairly submit that selfsame
issue raised in the present petition had been decided by
learned Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
18.02.2022 in Special Civil Application No.9823/2020 and
allied matters more particularly whereby, the substantive
request of the petitioner has been rejected. It is also
submitted that order of the learned Coordinate Bench has
been confirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench as well as
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1833/2021 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025
undefined
before the Hon'ble Apex Court.
2.1. It is submitted that the learned Single Judge has not
entertained the substantial grievance of the present petitioner
and whereas, the learned Coordinate Bench has interfered as
regards the aspect of recovery is concerned, more particularly
replying upon decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of
State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer),
reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334.
2.2. It is further submitted that the order of the learned
Single Judge has not been interfered with by the Hon'ble
Division Bench as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
3. The submissions made by learned advocates for the
petitioner could not be disputed by learned AGP Ms.Sarda and
Mr.Gautam.
4. Having regard to such a position, to this Court, it would
appear that while the substantive prayer made by the
petitioner for grant of equal pay for equal work is not required
to be entertained and whereas, the following directions are
passed:-
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1833/2021 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025
undefined
(i) The present petitions stand covered by judgment dated
18.02.2022 rendered in Special Civil Application
No.9823/2020 and allied matters.
(ii) While the entitlement of the petitioner for higher pay is
rejected, whereas, it is clarified that there shall be no
recovery from the present petitioner on account of reduction
in pay scale.
5. With these directions, the present petitions stand
disposed of a partly allowed.
(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) Bhoomi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!