Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 903 Guj
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/12123/2016 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE
FIR/ORDER) NO. 12123 of 2016
==========================================================
HIRABAW/O BHURABHAI MUNJABHAI JADEJA & ORS.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR K S CHANDRANI(6674) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4
MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
Date : 15/07/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of present petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs in para 8:-
"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this application.
(B) Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the FIR being II-C.R.No.133 of 2016 registered with Kamalabaugh Police Station, Porbandar at Annexure A. (C) Pending admission, final hearing and disposal of this petition, further proceedings and investigation with respect to the FIR being II-C.R.No.133 of 2016 registered with Kamalabaug Police Station, Porbandar may kindly be stayed in the interest of justice.
(D) Such other and further relief as deemed fit and proper may kindly be granted in the interest of justice."
2. Facts of the case are as under :-
2.1. The first informant/respondent no.2 herein is the PSI serving with Kamalabaug Police Station who has lodged the
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/12123/2016 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025
undefined
present FIR wherein it has been stated that on 12/04/2016 he along with his other police staff was present at the residence of one Bhurabhai Munjabhai Jadeja as there was one "Bhagavd Saptah was to be organized from 12/04/2016 to 18/04/2016 and as they have sought permission for procession (Pothiyatra) from Satyanarayan Temple to their residence i.e. Suraj Palace and during this (Pothiyatra) the members of the Maher community were in their traditional dresses and during this procession the petitioners took some photographs carrying one weapon(gun) which was owned by the accused no.1 and the aforesaid photographs were placed on social media which have gone viral and in the aforesaid manner the accused have committed the offence and hence the FIR.
3. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner. He has placed reliance on judgment of Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Virendra Ratanlal Purohit v/s. State of Gujarat [Criminal Misc.
Application No.10499 of 2021] and submitted that in view of bar contained in section 195(1)(a)(i) of the Cr.P.C., offence registered under section 188 of the IPC is not permissible without filing written complaint. In that circumstances, learned advocate for the petitioners submitted to exercise jurisdiction to quash the FIR.
4. Learned APP for the respondent - State on the other hand submitted to pass necessary order.
5. In identical fact situation, Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Virendra Purohit (supra) has vividly discussed the provision of
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/12123/2016 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025
undefined
law and bar under section 195(1)(a)(i) of Cr.P.C. for taking cognizance. The issue involved in the present case is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Virendra Purohit (supra). The petition deserves consideration.
6. In view of above, the petition is allowed. The impugned FIR being II-C.R.No.133 of 2016 registered with Kamalabaugh Police Station, Porbandar and further proceedings arising thereof are hereby quashed and set aside qua the petitioners herein. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
(J. C. DOSHI,J) SATISH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!