Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Cast And Blowers Co.(Guj.) ... vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 901 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 901 Guj
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

M/S.Cast And Blowers Co.(Guj.) ... vs State Of Gujarat on 15 July, 2025

                                                                                                                           NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/SCR.A/3205/2025                                               ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025

                                                                                                                            undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING)
                                            NO. 3205 of 2025

                      ==============================================
                          M/S.CAST AND BLOWERS CO.(GUJ.) PVT.LTD. THROUGH DINESH
                                     NATHABHAI PATEL(PEDHADIYA) & ANR.
                                                     Versus
                                          STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      ==============================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR PRATIK Y JASANI(5325) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
                      MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==============================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                                         Date : 15/07/2025
                                                            ORAL ORDER

Learned Advocate Ms.Yukta Jain with Mr. Jitendra T. Jain, state that

they have instructions to appear on behalf of the original complainant,

and thereby, seeks permission to file vakalatnama, which is granted.

[1] Rule. Learned Advocates waives service of rule for the respective

respondents.

[2] By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read

with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, the

petitioners have sought quashing of the judgment and order dated

03.09.2024, passed by the learned 33 rd Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Special Negotiable Instruments Act Court, Ahmedabad in

Criminal Case No.61341 of 2021, by which the petitioner no.2 has been

convicted and ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one

year and to pay the amount of Rs.6,61,722/- towards compensation to

the complainant and in default of payment of the said amount, the

petitioners to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of three

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/3205/2025 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025

undefined

months and as the petitioner no.2 was not present when the judgment

was pronounced, the learned Magistrate issued Non-bailable warrant

under Section 70 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioner.

[3] It appears that the settlement has been arrived at between the complainant and present petitioner and the entire cheque amount has been paid to the respondent complainant, which has been confirmed by the complainant by detailed affidavit, which is produced on record separately, the same is taken on record. The complainant do not wish to proceed further and is willing to compound the offence. Accordingly, the petitioner by filing this petition, seeks compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

[4] The petitioner also submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit costs as directed by the Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H., reported in (2010) 5 SCC 633, with the Legal Service Authority. The complainant in present in the Court and affirms the factum of settlement as well as filing of affidavit by him which is produced at Annexure - B.

[5] In case of Kripalsingh Pratapsingh Vs. Salvinder Kaur Hardisingh Lohana reported in (2004)2 GLH 544, the Coordinate Bench of this Court after considering various decisions of the Apex Court, took a view that it would be permissible for the High Court in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code, to record the settlement arrived at between the parties and acquit the accused of the charges.

[6] Thus, taking into account the fact of settlement, the compounding of the offence is hereby permitted.

[7] As a result, the petition is allowed. The judgment and order dated 03.09.2024, passed by the learned 33 rd Additional Chief Judicial

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/3205/2025 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2025

undefined

Magistrate, Special Negotiable Instruments Act Court, Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No.61341 of 2021, and warrant issued by it are hereby quashed and set aside. The petitioners are acquitted of the offences under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners are directed to deposit 15% of the cheque amount with the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority within a period of one week from the date of receipt of this order. Rule is made absolute to aforesaid extent. Direct service permitted.

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)

ANKIT JANSARI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter