Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Royal Sundaram General Insurance ... vs Krishnaben Harshadkumar Dave
2025 Latest Caselaw 884 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 884 Guj
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Royal Sundaram General Insurance ... vs Krishnaben Harshadkumar Dave on 14 July, 2025

                                                                                                               NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/CA/2593/2025                                    ORDER DATED: 14/07/2025

                                                                                                               undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                           R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2593 of
                                                      2025

                                              In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 7793 of 2025

                      ==========================================================
                                 ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
                                                     Versus
                                      KRISHNABEN HARSHADKUMAR DAVE & ORS.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR DAKSHESH MEHTA(2430) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR. RUSHANG D MEHTA(6989) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      KAASH K THAKKAR(7332) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
                      RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 4,5,6
                      ==========================================================

                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE

                                                          Date : 14/07/2025

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Rushang Mehta, learned advocate on record for the

applicant-original claimant. Learned advocate Mr. Kaash K. Thakkar

has entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3.

2. Rule issued by this Court is reported to have been duly served

upon the respondents, except for respondent no.6, who is the driver

of the other vehicle involved. However, his interest is represented

through the respondent- Insurance Company. Looking to the limited

prayer sought for in the present application, the present application is

taken up for hearing in their absence.







                                                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/CA/2593/2025                                    ORDER DATED: 14/07/2025

                                                                                                               undefined




3. The present application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation

Act, 1963, read with Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,

praying for condonation of delay of 109 days caused in preferring the

appeal.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant- Insurance Company has

submitted that impugned judgment and award was pronounced on

09.08.2024/12.08.2024. The certified copy of the order was made

available on 20.08.2024. The relevant papers along with certified copy

were forwarded to the Branch Office of the applicant- Insurance

Company on 25.08.2024, which was submitted to the Regional Office

on 02.09.2024. Further papers were directed to be forwarded to the

Regional Office, which was collected by the Branch Office later on,

and were tendered to the panel advocate on 01.12.2024. By referring

to the aforesaid events, learned advocate has submitted that because

of administrative reason, the delay of 109 days had crept in, which was

beyond the control, and has therefore, urged this Court to take liberal

view, and to condone the delay.

5. Learned advocate for the respondent nos.1 to 3-original

claimants has objected to the aforesaid explanation, and has urged

this Court to not entertain the present application.







                                                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/CA/2593/2025                                    ORDER DATED: 14/07/2025

                                                                                                               undefined




6. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties

and having perused the explanation offered, considering the fact that

all throughout the Insurance Company was pursuing the matter to

approach in appeal, this Court is inclined to take liberal view. Hence,

the delay of 109 days caused in preferring the appeal, deserves

consideration. The delay is condoned. The present Civil Application is

allowed, and stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute.

7. Registry is directed to register the First Appeal and list the same

on 21.07.2025. Registry is further directed to reflect the name of

learned advocate Mr. Kaash K. Thakkar representing the respondent

nos.1 to 3.

(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SUYASH SRIVASTAVA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter