Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 823 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2724 of 2025
================================================================
GLOBAL POWER THROUGH ITS PROP. MOHMEDABID MOHMEDHUSEN
LAKHANI
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
================================================================
Appearance:
SAGAR J SHAH(9447) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS SHRUNJAL SHAH, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
Date : 11/07/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Sagar J. Shah
for the petitioner and learned Assistant
Government Pleader Ms.Shrunjal Shah for the
respondents.
2. By this petition under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner has
challenged the order dated 30th July, 2021
passed by the respondent No.3-Assistant
Commissioner, Ghatak 75, Bhavnagar cancelling
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
the GST Registration Certificate of the
petitioner and the order dated 21.11.2024
passed by the respondent No.2-Deputy State Tax
Commissioner, Bhavnagar dismissing the Appeal
filed by the petitioner under Section 107 of
the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
on ground of limitation.
3. The brief facts of the case are as under :
3.1. The petitioner is engaged in business
of ship material trading by purchasing raw
material from old ships and selling them in
the market and is registered under the
provisions of the Gujarat Goods and Services
Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'the GST Act').
3.2. The respondent No.3 issued a show-
cause notice dated 22.07.2021 for cancellation
of the registration with following reasons :
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
"Issues any invoice or bill without supply of goods and/or services in violation of the provisions of this Act, or the rules made thereunder leading to wrongful availment or utilization of input tax credit or refund of tax."
3.3. The petitioner was directed to file
the reply within the seven working days and
appear on 30th July, 2021 before the
respondent No.3.
3.4. It appears that the petitioner
submitted reply on 30th July, 2021 online and
without providing any opportunity of hearing,
the respondent-Authority passed an ex-parte
order dated 30th July, 2021 whereby, the
effective date of cancellation of the
registration was stated as 01.07.2017.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
4.1. Learned advocate Mr.Sagar Shah for the
petitioner submitted that the petitioner has
also filed an additional affidavit on 7th
July, 2025 affirmed on 4th July, 2025 which
reads as under :
"2. I state and submit that the petitioner is willing and ready to comply with the legal requirements by filing all the pending statutory returns and is further willing to discharge the liability arising therefrom, including tax, interest, penalty, and late fees, as computed in the calculation report.
3. That the petitioner undertakes to pay the aforesaid amounts, subject to verification and confirmation by the concerned respondent authority, without prejudice to the petitioner's rights and contentions in the present proceedings."
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
4.2. It was submitted that in view of the
decision of this Hon'ble Court in case of
M/s. Aggrawal Dyeing & Printing vs. State of
Gujarat reported in (2022) 137 Taxmann.com 332
(Guj.), the respondent-Authority has failed to
give any reason while issuing the show-cause
notice and without considering the reply filed
by the petitioner on 30th July, 2021, the
order of cacellation or registration was
passed.
4.3. It was submitted that the petitioner
could not file the Appeal within the
stipulated time period and therefore, the
Appeal is also dismissed on the ground of
delay.
4.4. It was therefore submitted that as
held by this Court in case of M/s. Aggrawal
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
Dyeing (Supra), the matter may be remanded
back to the respondent No.3 to pass a fresh
de-novo order after considering the reply
filed by the petitioner and in view of the
additional affidavit filed by the petitioner
before this Court along with the computation
of tax, interest, penalty, etc., to be paid by
the petitioner as may be directed by the
respondent No.3 in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above submissions, it would
be germane to refer to the guidelines issued
by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the
case of M/s. Aggrawal Dyeing (Supra), which
read as under :
"18. Our final conclusion are as under:
18.1. Until the Department is able to develop and upload an appropriate software in the portal which would
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
enable the Department to feed all the necessary information and material particulars in the show cause notice as well as in the final order of cancellation of registration that may be passed, the authority concerned shall issue an appropriate show cause notice containing all the necessary details and information in a physical form and forward the same to the dealer by RPAD.
In the same manner, when it comes to passing the final order, the same shall also be passed in a physical form containing all the necessary information and particulars and shall be forwarded to the dealer by RPAD.
18.2 Over a period of time, we have noticed in many matters that the impugned order cancelling the registration of a dealer travels beyond the scope of the show cause notice. Many times, the dealer is taken by surprise when he gets to read in the order that the authority has relied upon some inspection report or spot visit report
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
etc. If the authority wants to rely upon any particular piece of evidence then it owes a duty to first bring it to the notice of the dealer so that if the dealer has anything to say in that regard, he may do so. Even if the authority wants to rely on any documentary evidence, the dealer should be first put to the notice of such documentary evidence and only thereafter, it may be looked into.
18.3 The aforesaid may appear to be very trivial issues but, it assumes importance in reducing the unnecessary litigation. Our concern is that on account of procedural lapses, the High Court should not be flooded with writ applications. The procedural aspects should be looked into by the authority concerned very scrupulously and deligently. Why unnecessarily give any dealer a chance to make a complaint before this Court when it could have been easily avoided by the department.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
19. In the result, all the writ applications deserve to be allowed solely on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice and, accordingly, the writ applications are allowed. We quash and set aside the respective show cause notices of all the writ applications, seeking cancellation of registration as well as the consequential respective impugned orders cancelling registration with liberty to the respondent No. 2 to issue fresh notice with particulars of reasons incorporated with details and thereafter to provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to the writ applicants, and to pass appropriate speaking orders on merits. It is needless to mention that it shall be open for the writ applicants to respond to such notices by filing objections / reply with necessary documents, if relied upon. We clarify that we have not gone into merits of the case."
6. The aforesaid judgment was rendered in the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
year 2022. However, in spite of the above
direction issued by this Court, the
respondent-authorities without following such
directions are issuing cryptic notice and
order for cancellation of registration number
of the petitioner.
7. In the present matter, order of
cancellation of registration is passed without
giving any reason by the respondent
authorities, and Appeal filed by the
petitioners under Section 107 of the GST Act
is also dismissed.
8. As the Appellate Authority has dismissed
the Appeals of the petitioner, the respondent-
Authorities will not be able to exercise the
revisional power under section 108 of the GST
Act. Therefore, the impugned order passed by
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
the Appellate Authority as well as the order
of cancellation of registration are required
to be quashed and set aside. Accordingly, the
matter is remanded back to the Assessing
Officer at the show-cause notice stage.
However, the registration of the petitioner
shall remain suspended till the show-cause
notice is decided by the Assessing Officer as
per the following directions:
(i) The Assessing Officer shall provide
detail reason for cancellation of
registration of the petitioners, if not
supplied earlier within a period of two
weeks from the date of receipt of copy
of this order.
(ii) Even if the reasons are supplied
earlier and if the petitioner requests
for the same, the respondent-authorities
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
shall again provide a copy of the
reasons for cancellation of the
registration upon such request.
(iii) The petitioner shall file written
reply upon receipt of the detail reasons
for issuance of the show-cause notice
for cancellation of registration within
a period of two weeks from the date of
receipt of the reasons.
(iv) After receipt of the reply from the
petitioner, the respondent authorities
shall pass appropriate order in
accordance with law after providing
opportunity of personal hearing to the
petitioner and after considering the
reply of the petitioners within a period
of four weeks from the date of personal
hearing.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
(v) The aforesaid timeline shall be
followed by both the sides. The
petitioner shall also cooperate with the
respondent-authorities in compliance of
the aforesaid timeline for disposal of
the show-cause notice by the respondent
authorities.
9. In view of the above, this petition is
partly allowed by quashing and setting aside
the impugned order passed by the Appellate
Authority as well as order of cancellation of
registration and the matter is remanded to
the Assessing Officer at show-cause notice
stage, however, the registration number of
the petitioner shall remain suspended till
such show cause notice is disposed of as per
the directions given above.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/2724/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025
undefined
10. It is clarified that this Court has not
gone into the merits of the matter. The
respondent-Authorities shall pass appropriate
order in accordance with law after providing
detailed reasons and opportunity of hearing
to the petitioner.
11. This petition is accordingly disposed of.
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
(PRANAV TRIVEDI,J) PALAK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!