Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 650 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/4577/2024 ORDER DATED: 07/07/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4577 of 2024
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024
In
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4577 of 2024
=======================================================================
KESHA KEVAL PONKIYA D/O KATIKKUMAR PATEL
Versus
KEVAL NARSINHBHAI PONKIYA
=======================================================================
Appearance:
A S TIMBALIA(7372) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1
=======================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
Date : 07/07/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)
The present appeal is filed by the appellant-wife
challenging judgment and decree dated 22.11.2024 passed by the
Judge, Family Court No.6, Ahmedabad in Family Suit No.406 of
2023. By the said judgment and decree, the Family Court directed
to dissolve the marriage between the appellant and the
respondents.
Notice was issued on 04.03.2025 returnable on
21.04.2025. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing,
learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that the matter is
amicably settled between the parties and an MoU is executed
between the parties. Mr.Keval Narsinhbhai Ponkiya-respondent-
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/4577/2024 ORDER DATED: 07/07/2025
undefined
husband is present in the Court and admits to execution of MoU
between the parties.
In the MoU, it is inter alia agreed between the parties
that as the appellant-wife is to go to Canada, custody of son Drishiv
would be with the respondent-father herein and till the appellant-
wife gets settled in Canada, there would be joint custody of son
Drishiv with the respondent-husband and the family of the
appellant-wife and as and when the appellant-wife comes to India,
the respondent-husband would give joint custody of son Drishiv to
the appellant-wife.
In view of the amicable settlement of the matter
between the parties, learned Advocate for the appellant seeks
permission to withdraw this appeal. Permission is granted. The
appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. The parties are directed
to abide by terms of MoU. Notice is discharged. No order as to
costs.
In view of the order passed in the main appeal, Civil
Application does not survive. Disposed of accordingly.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
(NSSG,J) SHITOLE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!