Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Paras Narsibhai Makwana vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 1416 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1416 Guj
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Paras Narsibhai Makwana vs State Of Gujarat on 28 July, 2025

                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/SCR.A/6985/2025                              ORDER DATED: 28/07/2025

                                                                                                            undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                               R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 6985 of 2025
                                                              With
                                    R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6924 of 2025
                                                              With
                                    R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6968 of 2025
                        ==========================================================
                                                PARAS NARSIBHAI MAKWANA
                                                             Versus
                                                  STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        KARTIK H BHATT(9313) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                        RULE NOT RECD BACK for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                        ==========================================================
                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                                      Date : 28/07/2025
                                                       ORAL ORDER

1. Mr. Poonam Mehta, learned advocate submits that she has instruction to appear on behalf of respondent no.2 in special criminal application no. 6985 of 2025 and Special Criminal Application No. 6968 of 2025. She is permitted to file her appearance.

2. Though respondent No. 2 has been served in Special Criminal Application No. 6924 of 2025, none appears on his behalf, either in person or through an advocate.

3. Rule. Learned advocates waive service of notice of Rule for the respective respondents.

4. By way of this application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 08.11.2024 passed by the learned 4 th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar at Mahuva in Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2024, Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2024, and Criminal Appeal No. 10 of 2024.

5. It appears that after a full-fledged trial, the petitioner was convicted by order dated 02.02.2024 in Criminal Case No. 2679 of

Page 1 of 3 pt

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/6985/2025 ORDER DATED: 28/07/2025

undefined

2022, Criminal Case No. 1121 of 2022, and Criminal Case No. 973 of 2022, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahuva at Bhavnagar, whereby the petitioner was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

6. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said conviction, the petitioner filed the aforesaid criminal appeals. In the said appeals, the learned Sessions Judge by order dated 29.02.2024 suspended the sentence till final disposal of the appeals and ordered the release of the petitioner on bail with certain conditions. One of the conditions imposed was that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon depositing 20% of the amount of compensation/fine before the Nazir of the District Court. Another condition was that, pending the hearing of the criminal appeals, the petitioner (original accused) shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of like amount.

7. It appears that the petitioner failed to comply with the order passed by the Sessions Court, as a result of which he was taken into custody. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and has been in jail since February 2025. The petitioner is now ready and willing to comply with the aforesaid order passed by the Sessions Court. In this regard, he has deposited 20% of the compensation/fine amount, and the deposit slip has been produced on record. The same is taken on record.

8. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, and relying upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col. S.S. Deswal v. Virender Gandhi, (2020) 2 SCC 514,

Page 2 of 3 pt

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/6985/2025 ORDER DATED: 28/07/2025

undefined

and Jamboo Bhandar v. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd., 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 776, the petitions are allowed. The impugned order dated 08.11.2024 passed by the learned 4 th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar at Mahuva in Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2024, Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2024, and Criminal Appeal No. 10 of 2024 is hereby quashed and set aside, as well as the conviction order dated 02.02.2024 passed in Criminal Case No. 2679 of 2022, Criminal Case No. 1121 of 2022, and Criminal Case No. 973 of 2022 by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahuva at Bhavnagar, are hereby suspended till the final disposal of the appeals. The petitioner shall be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mahuva, vide order dated 29.02.2024 in the above-mentioned criminal appeals. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted

9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. As Ms. Mehta, learned advocate appearing for respondent No. 2 has opposed the petitions and submitted that this Court may pass an order to release the amount in favour of the respondent No.2. The respondent No. 2-original complainant is at liberty to make an appropriate application before the learned Appellate Court, and the Appellate Court shall consider the same on its own merits.

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) ALI

Page 3 of 3 pt

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter