Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nilkant Vikram Trivedi vs Competent Authority And Special Land ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 1403 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1403 Guj
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Nilkant Vikram Trivedi vs Competent Authority And Special Land ... on 28 July, 2025

Author: Sunita Agarwal
Bench: Sunita Agarwal
                                                                                                                        NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/SCA/14130/2015                                            ORDER DATED: 28/07/2025

                                                                                                                        undefined




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                              R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14130 of 2015
                                                   With
                              CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR ORDERS) NO. 1 of 2023
                             In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14130 of 2015
                       =============================================
                                        NILKANT VIKRAM TRIVEDI
                                                 Versus
                            COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
                                            OFFICER & ORS.
                       =============================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR.VIKRAM TRIVEDI FOR MR YH VYAS(1001) for the Petitioner(s)
                       No. 1
                       MS.HETAL PATEL, ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP for the
                       Respondent(s) No. 1
                       MR HARSHEEL D SHUKLA(6158) for the Respondent(s) No. 7
                       MR JINESH H KAPADIA(5601) for the Respondent(s) No. 3,6
                       MS.MANVI DAMLE FOR MR MAULIK G NANAVATI(3318) for the
                       Respondent(s) No. 8
                       NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                       NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,4,5
                       VARINDER S SINGH(8290) for the Respondent(s) No. 4,5
                       =============================================
                        CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE
                              SUNITA AGARWAL
                              and
                              HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY

                                                          Date : 28/07/2025

                                                  ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)

1. The present petition has been filed essentially challenging the judgment and decree dated 07.08.2015 passed by the Civil Court on a reference made under Section 3H(3) of the National Highways Act' 1956, wherein claim of several persons interested in the lands in question for the purposes of disbursement of compensation determined under

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14130/2015 ORDER DATED: 28/07/2025

undefined

the award passed under the National Highways Act in accordance with Section 3H(1) has been adjudicated. The added prayers made in the writ petition about challenging the vires of Sections 3J, 3D(2) and 3G(7)(a) have been given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset. It is sought to be submitted in the writ petition that all throughout the proceedings, the original owner namely Subhash Rambhai Amin namely respondent No.2, who is represented through his Power of Attorney holder namely Vikram Manubhai Trivedi have never claimed any part of compensation as the land was already sold to the petitioner namely Nilkanth Vikram Trivedi by way of registered sale deed long ago and possession of the entire property lie with the petitioner.

2. Be that as it may, the challenge in the present petition is tot the validity of the judgment and decree dated 07.08.2015 on various statement of facts, which are sought to be disputed before us. As no factual inquiry can be made within the scope of Article 227 of the Constitution of India, we do not find it a fit case to adjudicate.

3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition in its entirety, inasmuch as, he proposes to avail the appropriate remedy to assail the judgment and decree dated 07.08.2015 in Land Reference Case No.2 of 2015 passed by the Court of Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nadiad.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14130/2015 ORDER DATED: 28/07/2025

undefined

4. In view of the above statement made by Mr.Y. H. Vyas, the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of arguments, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim relief(s), if any, stand(s) discharged. Pending civil application stands disposed of.

(SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ )

(D.N.RAY,J) SAHIL S. RANGER

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter