Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Patel Narendrakumar Trikamlal vs Chimanbhai Naranbhai Patel
2025 Latest Caselaw 1293 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1293 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Patel Narendrakumar Trikamlal vs Chimanbhai Naranbhai Patel on 24 July, 2025

                                                                                                                       NEUTRAL CITATION




                            C/SCA/9915/2025                                         ORDER DATED: 24/07/2025

                                                                                                                        undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                     R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9915 of 2025

                      ==========================================================
                                              PATEL NARENDRAKUMAR TRIKAMLAL
                                                                 Versus
                                           CHIMANBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL & ORS.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR KUNAL S SHAH(5282) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                      MR KIRTIDEV R DAVE(3267) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      MR RAHUL K DAVE(3978) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT

                                                            Date : 24/07/2025

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Kunal S. Shah for the

petitioner and learned Advocate Mr. Kirtidev R. Dave for the

respondent No.1 appearing on caveat.

2. The present application is filed under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:

"9. YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, direction, or writ in nature of certiorari, a. To admit and allow this petition;

b. To set aside the order dated 2-7-2025 passed below Exhibit-562 in Special Civil Suit No.933/2010 by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Dholka, which is at Annexure-A, and be pleased to grant the relief prayed for in the application Exhibit-562, which is at Annexure-A.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9915/2025 ORDER DATED: 24/07/2025

undefined

c. Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, be pleased to stay the implementation, operation, and effect of the order dated 2-7-2025 passed below Exhibit-562 in Special Civil Suit No. 933/2010 by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Dholka, which is at Annexure-A and stay the further proceeding of Special Civil Suit No. 933/2010 pending in the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Dholka;

d. Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, be pleased to grant ad interim relief in terms of paragraph (c) above; e. Pass any such other and/or further orders that may be thought just and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

3. At the outset, learned Advocate Mr. Shah would submit that

despite the law laid down by the Division Bench of this

Court in the case of Bharat Heavy Electronics Limited V/s.

INEOS Styrolution Ltd reported in 2021 AIR Gujarat 12

followed by learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of

Bhavesh Nareshchandra Amin V/s. Dilipbhai Bhaktiprasad

Doshi reported in 2023 (3) GLR 2404 , an impugned

application filed for issuance of witness-summons by the

petitioner, who happens to be defendant No.3 in the suit

came to be rejected by the Trial Court.

4. Per contra, learned Advocate Mr. Dave appearing for the

original plaintiff would submit that a plain reading of

impugned application is nothing but a declaration given by

defendant No.3, who intends to examine the persons/

witnesses shown in the impugned application and has not

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9915/2025 ORDER DATED: 24/07/2025

undefined

made any request for issuance of any witness-summons to

those persons.

5. Learned Advocate Mr. Dave would further submit that as

such impugned application cannot be treated as a formal

application for issuance of witness-summons, but it is a

declaration and through pursis, it was filed before the Trial

Court.

6. Learned Advocate Mr. Dave would further submit that as

per Order 16, Rule 1 read with Rule 3 of Code of Civil

Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "CPC"), defendant

No.3 was required to assign reasons for the examination of

witnesses, which is missing in the said declaration-cum-

pursis.

7. After hearing the parties, prima facie, it appears that

impugned application filed below Exh.562 in Special Civil

Suit No.933 of 2010 pending before the Principal Senior

Civil Judge, Dholka is not an application for praying for

issuance of witness-summons, but only a declaration that

defendant No.3 intends to examine those persons stated in

such declaration.

8. It is true that as per the judgments cited by the learned

Advocate Mr. Shah appearing for the petitioner i.e. Bharat

Heavy Electronics Limited (supra) and Bhavesh

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9915/2025 ORDER DATED: 24/07/2025

undefined

Nareshchandra Amin (supra), if any application filed under

Order 16, Rule 1 of CPC by the party to the suit requires to

be allowed, but at the same time, the party needs to follow

the procedure as set out in Order 16, Rule 1 read with Rule

3 of CPC, which appears to have not been followed in the

present case.

9. At this stage, learned Advocates appearing for the

respective parties are ad idem that let petitioner/defendant

No.3 file an appropriate application before the Trial Court

seeking appropriate relief regarding issuance of witness

summons to the witnesses which defendant No.3 intends to

examine and such application may be decided by the Trial

Court in accordance with law.

10. Having heard the learned Advocates appearing for the

respective parties and after analysing the aforesaid facts

and as such, there is a consensus ad idem to the fact that

petitioner/defendant No.3 is required to file an appropriate

application, seeking prayer for issuance of witness

summons, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner/defendant

No.3 shall file an appropriate application within seven days

from the date of receipt of the copy this order with all

particulars as required under law by serving an advance

copy to the respondent No.1/plaintiff.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9915/2025 ORDER DATED: 24/07/2025

undefined

11. It is open for the respondent No.1/plaintiff to file any

objection, if any. After hearing the parties, the Trial Court

shall decide such application in accordance with law without

being influenced by any of its observations and anything

observed hereinabove, albeit to decide it as per law.

12. With the aforesaid observations and directions, nothing

more requires to be done at this stage in the present case.

Accordingly, the present writ application is disposed of. No

order as to costs. Direct service is permitted.

(MAULIK J.SHELAT,J) Nilesh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter