Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Patel Amrutlal Hargovandas vs Lhs Of Decd. Amrutlal Keshavlal
2025 Latest Caselaw 2922 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2922 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Patel Amrutlal Hargovandas vs Lhs Of Decd. Amrutlal Keshavlal on 11 February, 2025

                                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/CA/4796/2024                               ORDER DATED: 11/02/2025

                                                                                                          undefined




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY)
                                       NO. 4796 of 2024
                                             In
                               F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 25890 of 2024

                      ======================================
                               PATEL AMRUTLAL HARGOVANDAS
                                          Versus
                          LHS OF DECD. AMRUTLAL KESHAVLAL & ORS.
                      ======================================
                      Appearance:
                      HARSH V GAJJAR(7828) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR BHAVESH BABARIYA(6788) for the Respondent(s) No. 2.1,2.2,3
                      RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4
                      ======================================

                      CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE

                                                      Date : 11/02/2025

                                                       ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Harsh V. Gajjar, learned advocate for the applicant and Ms. Trusha Patel, learned Senior Advocate with Ms. Jhanvi, learned advocate on record for the respondent.

2. The present application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 210 days occurred in preferring the captioned appeal.

3. At the outset, learned advocate for the applicant has referred to the averments made in the application and submitted that the impugned order was pronounced on 9 th November, 2023 whereby the suit of the present applicant - original plaintiff was not entertained in light of Order-VII Rule-11(a) (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It is

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/CA/4796/2024 ORDER DATED: 11/02/2025

undefined

submitted that the applicant rendered his voluntary services as a helper/assistant in a temple and he is a senior citizen. The applicant was facing financial crunch and was unable to meet with the Court fees and other expenses. The attention of this Court was invited to the additional affidavit, whereby the circumstances faced by the applicant have been explained. In support of the aforesaid contentions, it is further submitted that when the funds were made managed the applicant had immediately applied for certified copy on 2 nd July, 2024. The certified copy of which was made available on 6 th August, 2024. The further time was consumed in seeking advice from the learned advocate being engage to represent his case. It is further submitted that necessary papers were supplied to the learned advocate. By making aforesaid submissions, learned advocate has submitted that all throughout, the applicant intended to persue the appeal. However, because of the circumstances beyond his control, he could not approach the Court within the prescribed period of limitation. He has had therefore, submitted that there was no malice or inaction or negligence on the part of the applicant to not to approach in appeal within the prescribed period of limitation.

3.1 The reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Raheem Shah and Another Vs. Govind Singh and others reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 910 to contend that generally, the Court should take liberal approach, more particularly when the parties were litigating with regard to the right over immovable properties and substantial rights were to be decided between the parties.






                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/CA/4796/2024                                       ORDER DATED: 11/02/2025

                                                                                                                  undefined




4. Ms. Trusha K. Patel, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent has vehemently objected to the aforesaid submissions made by the learned advocate for the applicant. The attention of this Court was invited to the averments made in the application. It was submitted that the appeal arises out of the suit which was filed seeking specific performance, wherein the plaintiffs are expected to demonstrate their financial capacity to meet with the status of purchasing the land agreed to be sold. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the respondent that therefore the burden was upon the applicant - original plaintiff to prove his readiness and willingness to perform the part of his contract, which also indicates the payment of the amount of consideration being agreed. Whereas in the present application, the only ground which is urged as is evident from the averments made in the application is the financial crunch which prevented him from approaching in appeal within the stipulated period of limitation. She has therefore urged this Court to record the aforesaid facts, which otherwise is contradictory to what he could have demonstrated before the trial Court.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned advocates for the respective parties and looking to the explanation offered, this Court is of the view that the applicant all throughout intended to pursue the proceedings. Looking to the circumstances pointed-out more particularly the fact that the applicant is a senior citizen and is tendering his services as a helper in a temple. In absence of any

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/CA/4796/2024 ORDER DATED: 11/02/2025

undefined

contradictions being pointed-out to the aforesaid aspect, this Court has reason to believe the aforesaid fact and the case of the applicant of having faced financial constrains which did not permit him to approach in appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. The challenge is to the order passed on an application preferred by the respondent under Order-VII Rule-11 (a)(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Court has reason to believe that the suit has been rejected at the threshold without offering any opportunity to lead the evidence.

6. Considering the judgment of the Hon'le Supreme Court in case of Raheem Shah and Another (supra), applying the same in the facts of the case, which involves the dispute with regard to specific performance of an immovable property and the substantial rights being under consideration, this Court is inclined to exercise its discretion, looking to the fact that there is no malice or inaction on the part of the applicant.

7. Considering the overall aspect of the matter, the explanation offered sufficient cause has been made-out to consider the present application seeking condonation of delay. The present application stands allowed. The delay caused in preferring the captioned appeal is hereby condoned.

(NISHA M. THAKORE, J.) AMAR RATHOD...

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter