Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1584 Guj
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3166/2025 ORDER DATED: 01/08/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3166 of 2025
In
F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 15693 of 2025
=======================================================================
NARENDRASINH RAJUSINH BIHOLA
Versus
KAILASBEN RAMESHBHAI MANGALBHAI SODHA PARMAR
=======================================================================
Appearance:
DEV D PATEL(8264) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
KURVEN K DESAI(7786) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=======================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
Date : 01/08/2025
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)
1. This application is filed by the applicant under Section
5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 13 days in
preferring the appeal against judgment and decree dated
13.01.2025 the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kheda at Nadiad in
Family Suit No.113 of 2023.
2. Rule was issued on 13.06.2025 returnable on
27.06.2025. In response to the Rule, learned Advocate Mr.Kurven
Desai appears for the respondent.
3. Learned Advocate has drawn attention of this Court to
the contents of para-3 to 6 of the application and submitted that
there is delay of 13 days in approaching this Court.
4. Learned advocate for the respondent formally opposes
the grant of application.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3166/2025 ORDER DATED: 01/08/2025
undefined
5. Considering the aforesaid, particularly, period of 13
days of delay, the Court is of the view that considering the facts
involved in the case, delay cannot be treated as inordinate.
6. Considering the submissions and the contents of the
application mentioned hereinabove, the delay is also explained
sufficiently.
7. A reference in this regard may be made to the
judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Sheo Raj Singh
(Deceased) through Legal Representatives and others vs/. Union of
India and Another, reported in, (2023) 10 SCC 531, wherein the
term "Sufficient Cause" was interpreted and the approach of
Courts while deciding application for condonation of delay was
discussed.
8. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed. The
delay of 13 is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute.
9. Registry is directed to list the main appeal in due
course.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
(NSSG,J) SHITOLE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!