Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 671 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2023
C/SCA/9776/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9776 of 2011
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT
==========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
ASHOKKUMAR VITHALDAS MODH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 4 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VAIBHAV A VYAS(2896) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS POOJA ASHAR, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR SHALIN MEHTA, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MS SHIKHA PANCHAL
WITH MS VIDHI J BHATT(6155) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2,4,5
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT
Date : 25/01/2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. The present petition is filed by the petitioner
C/SCA/9776/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
with the following reliefs:
"14(A) Quashing and setting aside the circular dt.27.5.2011, order dt.26.7.2011 and the Resolution dt.21.5.2011 and directing the Respondents to grant the benefit of 6 th Pay Commission w.e.f. 1.1.2006 and refund the amount if any recovered from the petitioner, with 8% interest.
(B) During the pendency and final disposal of this petition the respondent nos.3 and 5 may be restrained from implementing the circular dt.27.5.2011 and 26.7.2011.
(C) During the pendency and final disposal of this petition, the Respondents may be restrained from affecting any recovery and refixing the pay pursuant to the Order dt.26.7.2011.
(D) To grant such and further relief as may be deemed fit and proper."
2. The petitioner's case in brief is that the
petitioner was appointed as Junior Clerk on 20.9.1984
under the respondent no.3-board and he worked as such,
from 20.9.1984 to 30.4.2006. Thereafter, from 1.5.2006, he
was sent on deputation to Adijati Vikas Commissioner,
Gandhinagar. He was relieved on 14.2.2007 and
C/SCA/9776/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
thereafter he joined Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad on
15.2.2007. Thereafter, from 1.5.2008, the petitioner is
working as Junior Clerk under respondent no.5-college.
He was sent on deputation on the basis of resolution
dated 8.5.2007 passed by respondent no.1. Thereafter, by th resolution dated 20.3.2009 passed by respondent no.1, 6
pay commission was implemented qua the petitioner.
Accordingly, the pay of the petitioner was fixed with
effect from 1.1.2006 and was paid all benefits and all
arrears, in accordance with the aforesaid resolution vide
order dated 23.4.2009. Thereafter, the respondent no.2
issued resolution dated 21.5.2011 stating that pay
revision will be applicable from 1.1.2009 instead of
1.1.2006. Pursuant to the said resolution dated 21.5.2011, respondent no.3 issued circular dated 27.5.2011 stating
that pay revision will be applicable from 1.1.2009 and
accordingly, respondent no.5 passed order on 26.7.2011 th withdrawing the benefit of 6 pay commission and placed th the petitioner in the pay scale of 5 pay commission
with effect from 1.7.2011 in pay scale of Rs.4000-6000/-
and his pay was fixed at Rs.5500/- and recovery of the
pay granted from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2008 was ordered.
Therefore, the present petition is filed with the aforesaid
C/SCA/9776/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
prayers.
3. This Court initially issued notice vide order
dated 1.8.2011, which reads as under:
"Heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of respective
parted (sic. parties).
Considering submissions made by both learned
advocates, issue NOTICE to respondents returnable on 2 nd
September, 2011.
Meanwhile, no recovery is to be effected from salary
of petitioner in pursuance of order dated 26 th July, 2011 till
nd September, 2011.
Direct service is permitted."
4. Thereafter, vide order dated 16.8.2012 admitted
the petition. Thereafter, on an application made by the
Gujarat Housing Board being CA (for direction) No.8232
of 2015 in the present petition, this Court passed order
on 20.10.2015, which reads as under:
"By way of this Civil Application request is made to permit
C/SCA/9776/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
re-fixation of pay of opponent No.5-original petitioner in the Sixth Pay Commission from 1.1.2009 and to pay him salary in accordance with the re-fixed amount, every month.
Heard both the sides. Learned advocate Ms.Vidhi Bhatt urged to refix the salary of the petitioner on the line of application. Learned advocate Mr.A.S.Supehia appearing for the respondent No.5 has no objection to the re-fixation made from 1.1.2009 and if the original petitioner be paid as per re-fixed amount, as per communication dated 7 th September, 2015.
As no objection is raised to the request by the Opponent No.5, the applicant shall be paid salary as per the re- fixation made from 1st November, 2015. However, the respondent-Board shall not recover any amount till the outcome of the main petition, in light of the decision of the Apex Court rendered in case of State of Punjab Vs.Rafik Masih reported in 2014(14) Scale 300.
This Civil Application stands disposed of in above terms.
Main matter i.e. SCA No.9776 of 2011 to appear on 5th November, 2015."
5. Today, when the matter is called out, learned
advocate for the petitioner Mr.Vyas has submitted that
C/SCA/9776/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
his main grievance is redressed by order dated
20.10.2015 passed in Civil Application No.8232 of 2015.
However, he has requested that in view of the judgment
of Rafik Masih referred to in the order passed in Civil
Application, the respondents be directed to not to enforce
any recovery from the petitioner and dispose of this
petition accordingly.
6. Per contra, learned senior counsel Mr.Mehta appearing for the respondent no.1-board submitted that
apropos to the request made by learned advocate for the
petitioner that if the interest of the respondent-board
which is protected by interim order passed by this Court
in Civil Application No.8232 of 2015 by order dated 20.10.2015 is continued while disposing of the present
petition, then the respondent-board may not have any
objection for the same. With regard to the aspect of any
coercive recovery, he has submitted that in view of the
judgment of Rafik Masih (supra), this Court may pass
appropriate order considering the rival submissions and
considering the averments made in the petition and
annexures annexed with the petition.
C/SCA/9776/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
7. Considering the rival submissions, papers on
record and the previous orders passed by this Court in
this petition, this Court deems it appropriate to allow
this petition partly by directing the respondent-authority
not to make any coercive recovery against the petitioner
in view of the judgment of Rafik Masih (supra). However, it is clarified that the order passed in Civil
Application No. 8232 of 2015 dated 20.10.2015 shall be
considered as final relief in the present petition and
shall continue.
8. With above observation, this petition is
disposed of. No order as to costs.
(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) SRILATHA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!