Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1771 Guj
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2023
C/FA/586/2015 ORDER DATED: 21/02/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 586 of 2015
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1894 of 2015
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1895 of 2015
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1896 of 2015
==========================================================
MADHUBHAI VIRJIBHAI DHANANI
Versus
BATUKBHAI NANJIBHAI DUDHAT & 7 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS. SANGEETA PAHWA FOR THAKKAR AND PAHWA ADVOCATES(1357) for
the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR ARPIT A KAPADIA(3974) for the Defendant(s) No. 3,4
MR SATYAM Y CHHAYA(3242) for the Defendant(s) No. 6,7,8
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
RULE UNSERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 5
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 21/02/2023
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI)
1. Present group of appeals have been arising from the judgment
and decree dated 04.03.2015 passed by learned 12 th Additional Senior
Civil Judge, Surat in Special Civil Suit No.320 of 2005, Regular Civil Suit
No.355 of 2004, Regular Civil Suit No.385 of 2003 and Regular Civil
Suit No.113 of 2007. All the appeals are admitted by this Court.
C/FA/586/2015 ORDER DATED: 21/02/2023
2. Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, learned
advocate Ms. Sangeeta Pahwa appearing for the appellants states that
the dispute is amicably settled between the parties.
Affidavits/unconditional withdrawal pursis have been filed by the
appellant in all the appeals. Appellants are present before this Court
and state that they do not want to proceed further with the appeals.
The demand drafts have been handed over by the respondents to the
appellants as recorded in the affidavit/ pursis. Appellants have
confirmed the said statement.
3. In view of the above statement, present appeals stand disposed
of as withdrawn unconditionally.
4. It is hereby made clear that these appeals are not heard on
merits. Accordingly, Registry is directed to refund the court fees in
favor of the appellants in accordance with law.
(A.J.DESAI, J)
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SUYASH SRIVASTAVA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!