Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1572 Guj
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2023
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2233 of 2023
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
================================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed NO
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? NO
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy NO
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
================================================================
SHERASIYA INAYAT HUSAINBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
MR BHARAT T RAO(697) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5
MR DHAWAN JAYSWAL, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 15/02/2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Heard, learned advocate Mr. Bharat T. Rao for
the petitioners and learned Assistant Government
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
Pleader Mr. Dhawan Jayswal for the respondent
Nos. 1 and 2. Though served, no one appears for
respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
2. Rule. Learned Assistant Government Pleader
Mr. Dhawan Jayswal waives service of notice of
rule on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Notice of rule is not required to be issued upon
respondent Nos. 3 and 4 as the issues involved in
this petition are purely of legal nature and
character and sufficient assistance is rendered
by the learned Assistant Government Pleader
Mr. Jayswal.
3. Having regard to the controversy in narrow
compass, with the consent of the learned
advocates for both the sides, the petition is
taken up for final hearing.
4. By this petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioners have
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
prayed for the following reliefs:
"38(B) To issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by quashing and setting aside the Amendment Order of delimitation of constituencies passed by respondent No. 2 on 6.2.2023 (Annexure-K) and further be pleased to quash and set aside the final voter list published by the respondent No. 2 and order dated 6.2.2023 (Annexure-M) passed by respondent No. 2 publishing the further election programme and be pleased to declare that the delimitation of constituencies made vide order dated 19.1.2023 of the respondent No. 2 is final and direct the respondent No. 2 to start the election process from the stage of preparation of voter list for the reasons stated in the memo of the petition and in the interest of justice.
(C) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordships be pleased to stay the further proceedings for the election of Vankaner Taluka Kharid Vechan Sahakari Sangh Ltd. for the reasons stated in the memo of the petition and in the interest of justice."
5. Brief facts of the case are as under:
5.1 The petitioners are authorised
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
representatives of their respective primary
cooperative societies registered under the
Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961
(hereinafter, "the Act") since years. The
primary cooperative societies to which the
petitioners belong to are dispensing agriculture
credit to its members. The societies are
affiliated with The Wankaner Taluka Sahakari
Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. (hereinafter, "the
Sangh").
5.2 The Election of Managing Committee of the
Sangh was held in the year 2017 under the
provisions of the Gujarat Specified Cooperative
Societies (Elections to Committees) Rules, 1982
(hereinafter, "the Rules, 1982"). The petitioner
No. 4 is the elected Member and Chairman of the
Sangh. The term of the Managing Committee had
expired on 23.01.2023. The Sangh called its
Annual General Meeting (AGM) on 17.09.2022,
Agenda of which, came to be circulated on
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
06.09.2022 in due compliance with the provisions
of the Agenda was with regard to delimitation of
constituencies as per bye-law No. 29 of the bye-
laws of the Sangh.
5.3 In the meeting held on 17.09.2022 in which
all 47 Members of the General Board were present,
12 constituencies came to be made of which, each
constituency got four primary cooperative
societies which are affiliated to the Sangh. Out
of 47 Members, 04 members had objected such
delimitation made by the General Board. Such
objection was overruled keeping in view the bye-
laws of the Sangh by majority decision.
5.4 On 18.09.2022, the proceedings of the AGM was
published on the Notice Board of the Sangh,
however, as required under the Rules, 1982,
nobody raised any objection against the
delimitation of the constituencies.
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
5.5 On 14.11.2022, the Sangh forwarded a proposal
to the District Registrar, Cooperative Societies,
Morbi as required for the purpose of holding the
election of the Managing Committee, copy thereof,
came to be forwarded to the Collector, Morbi and
the Deputy Collector, Vankaner.
5.6 On 12.12.2022, the District Registrar,
Cooperative Societies, Morbi forwarded the
proposal of holding election of Managing
Committee of the Sangh to the Collector, Morbi.
5.7 On 19.01.2023, the Deputy Collector, passed
the order of delimitation of constituencies under
Rule 3(A)(9) of the Rules, 1982.
5.8 On 20.01.2023, provisional Voters' List was
published on the notice board of the Sangh and
the panchnama was also prepared.
5.9 The respondent No. 3 - Society submitted
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
objections against publication of provisional
Voters' List on 27.01.2023 and also submitted
revised delimitation of considerations on its
own. The respondent No. 4 also raised objection,
without giving a copy to the Sangh, the
respondent No. 4 directly supplied the copy of
objection to the Deputy Collector.
5.10 On 30.01.2023, the respondent No. 2 - Deputy
Collector issued a notice to the objectors giving
its copy to the Sangh and fixed hearing on
01.02.2023. The Sangh submitted reply on
31.01.2023, 02.02.2023 and 05.02.2023.
5.11 On 06.02.2023, the respondent No. 2 passed
the Amendment Order of delimitation of
constituencies thereby, entirely changing the
delimitation and passed the order of delimitation
as suggested by respondent No. 3. On the same
day, the respondent No. 2 also published the
final Voters' List and published further election
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
programme. Being aggrieved, the petitioners have
preferred this petition with aforesaid prayers.
6. Mr. Bharat T. Rao, learned advocate for the
petitioners submitted that by the impugned order
dated 06.02.2023, the respondent No. 2 has sat as
appellate authority over his own order dated
19.01.2023 by treating the order dated 19.01.2023
passed under Rule 3(A)(9) of the Rules, 1982 as a
provisional order for delimitation.
6.1 It was submitted that there is nothing like
provisional delimitation order which could be
passed under the provisions of the Act and Rules,
1982.
6.2 Reliance was placed upon the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajkot
District Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of
Gujarat and Others, (2015) 13 SCC 401, to submit
that the Collector is required to exercise the
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
power of delimitation of constituency or
constituencies prior to the publication of the
Voters' List or at the best simultaneously with
the publication of the Voters' List. It was
pointed out that in the facts of the case, the
order dated 19.01.2023 was issued for
delimitation of the constituencies of the Sangh
along with the provisional Voters' List and
therefore, subsequently on receipt any of
objections to the Voters' List, the Deputy
Collector who has already passed the order on
19.01.2023, could not have treated the said order
as provisional order for delimitation and could
not have passed an amended order of delimitation
on 06.02.2023.
6.3 It was further submitted that by passing an
amended order of delimitation, the entire
composition of the constituencies is changed and
thereby, the petitioners and other persons who
are desirous to contest the election, are
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
deprived of their support base of voters.
6.4 It was submitted that as per the provisions
of Rule 3(A)(8) read with Rule 3(A)(9) of the
Rules, 1982, the Collector or his delegated
authority i.e. Deputy Collector can pass an order
of delimitation prior to or at the best
simultaneously with the publication of the
Voters' List and once an order of delimitation is
passed, the authority becomes functus officio and
cannot re-look into it.
7. On the other hand, learned Assistant
Government Pleader Mr. Jayswal for the respondent
Nos. 1 and 2 referred to and relied upon the
averments made in the affidavit-in-reply filed on
behalf of the respondent No. 2 - Deputy Collector
and Election Officer and submitted that the order
dated 06.02.2023 is passed in consonance with the
directions issued in Full Bench decision of this
Court in the case of Narendrabhai Mahijibhai
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
Patel & 7 v. State of Gujarat & 5, passed in
Special Civil Application No. 12067 of 2015 and
cognate matters on 04.07.2013.
7.1 It was submitted that after issuance of the
order dated 19.01.2023, objections were received
by the respondent No. 2 and considering such
objections in the light of the observations made
by the Full Bench, the respondent No. 2 treated
the order dated 19.01.2023 as provisional
delimitation order and passed a fresh order on
06.02.2023 and therefore, the said order is legal
and tenable in law.
7.2 It was further submitted that election
declared by respondent No. 2 is already under
process and date for voting is fixed on
22.02.2023. It was, therefore, submitted that
this petition should not be entertained at this
stage and the petitioners should avail the remedy
of election petition if they are aggrieved by the
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
impugned order dated 06.02.2023.
7.3 In support of his submissions, the learned
Assistant Government Pleader has referred to and
relied upon following averments made in the
affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondent No. 2:
"3. It is respectfully submitted that the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable for the following reasons:
a. That no fundamental rights and legal rights of the petitioners are infringed in any manner.
b. That the decision taken by the answering respondent is in accordance with provisions of Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 and the Election to Committee Rules 1982 and the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Rules, 1965.
c. That there is no illegal or irregularities in decision making process, the decision arrived at by the answering respondent is just and proper.
d. That the petitioners in the petition have raised disputed question of facts, and the election of the Shree Vankaner Taluka
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
Sahakari Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. is due to be held as the earlier term of the Members of the Board of Directors of the Society was expired on 23.01.2023. The Election program dated 06.02.2023 was published in accordance with law after following the provisions of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 (Act of 1961) and the Gujarat Specified Cooperative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982 (Rules of 1982) and in consonance with the Judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court and accordingly Election procedure started and therefore also, the answering respondent prays before this Hon'ble Court that this petition may not entertained.
e. That present petition is also not maintainable for non-joinder of the necessary party as the petitioners have not joined the concerned Society as a party respondent in the present petition.
f. That in view of the aforesaid the answering respondent be allowed to proceed further with the steps in the direction of holding of free and fair election as all disputes which are raised in the present petition may be allowed to be raised after the election is completed.
4. That in view of the aforesaid present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable, more particularly the term
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
of the present Managing Committee expired on 23.01.2023 and therefore, all the issues raised in the writ petition may be allowed to be raised after the election is complete as provided under Section 145U of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act 1961 and in view of Rule 74 of the Gujarat Specified Cooperative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982.
5. It is submitted that once the
election process has commenced,
ordinarily the Hon'ble Courts may not exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The settled principle of law is laid down by Full Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Daheda Group Seva Sahakari Mandli Limited V. R. D. Rohit reported in 2006 (1) GCD 11 have held that Court ordinarily would not like to exercise its power under Article 226 of the Constitution when the process of election has been set in motion even though there may be some alleged illegality or breach of rules while preparing the electoral roll. Thus, once the process of election is set in motion, the present petition invoking writ jurisdiction at this stage may be dismissed limine."
6. It is most humbly and respectfully submitted that the term of the Society was expired on 23.01.2023 and in view of the issue as decided by the Larger Bench of this Hon'ble Court and thereafter the Hon'ble Apex Court the election the State Authority has initiated the procedure for election of the Committee
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
members of the Society...."
7.4 Relying upon the above submissions on factual
aspects it was further referred to and rely upon
the following averments:
"13.I further say and submit that pursuant to the provisional Voters' List dated 19.01.2023, two objections were raised, one by respondent No. 4 herein i.e. Kadivar Ismail Fatemamad who had raised objection on 24.01.2023 and one by respondent No. 3 herein i.e. by Shree Kotada Nayani Seva Sahakari Mandli Ltd. on 27.01.2023. The copy of the objections dated 24.01.2023 and 27.01.2023 are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure-R2 Collectively.
14. I say and submit that after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned, and after verifying the actual geographical position of all the constituencies, the answering respondent had passed amended order on 06.02.2023 for delimitation of the constituencies by considering the area of the operation of the Specified Society and as per provisions of Section 3(A)(9) of the Election Rules, 1982. And further published the final voter list on 06.02.2023 by publishing the election program by fixing the further stages of election of the managing committee of the concerned Specified Society by fixing the date of election on
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
22.02.2023. The copy of the amended order of delimitation dated 06.02.2023 is annexed at page no. 68 and the election program is annexed at page no. 76 with the memo of the petition.
15. I say and submit that keeping in mind the specific objection with regards to the delimitation of the constituencies and therefore the answering respondent respectfully submit that the verification of delimitation of the constituencies were carried out and after considering the geographical area of operation and situation of the all the constituencies and member primary societies, the answering respondent as per power conferred under Section 145(B) of the Act of 1961 and as per the provisions of Rules 3(A)(8) and (9) of the Election Rules of 1982 had passed order on 06.02.2023 of delimitation of the Constituencies of the concerned Specified Society. The chart showing the position as on 19.01.2023 and 06.02.2023 is placed at page no. 70 with the memo of the petition. I crave leave to rely upon the color map of the delimitation of 12 constituencies at the time of hearing of the present petition.
16. I say and submit that the election process has already commenced, with the election program being notified on 06.02.2023 and the Final Voters' List was published on 06.02.2023 and as per the different stages of the Election program, the stages of accepting and withdrawing of Nomination Form was over and name of contesting candidates will be published on 13.02.2023."
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
7.5 Referring the above submissions made in the
affidavit-in-reply, it was submitted that the
respondent No. 2, after considering the
objections raised after publication of the
Voters' List, has passed the impugned order in
accordance with the observations made by the Full
Bench of this Court in the aforesaid decision.
8. Having heard the learned advocates for the
respective parties and having considered the
material on record, it appears that Rule 3(A)9 of
the Rules, 1982 confers powers upon the Collector
with regard to the delimitation of the
constituencies for the purpose of election. Rule
3(A)(9) of the Rules, 1982 reads as under:
"3A.Delimitation of constituencies for purpose of election.-(1) In every society where there are more than one constituencies, the Secretary or where there is a post of Secretary, the Chief Executive Officer of every such society shall, in the year preceding the year in which election to the Committee is scheduled to be held, prepare a
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
provisional list of constituencies.
(2) Such list shall describe the limits of each constituency. A copy of the provisional list shall be displayed with a notice to be signed by the Secretary or where there is no post of Secretary, the Chief Executive Officer of the society on the notice board of every office or sub-office of the society. A copy of such provisional list along with the notice shall also be sent to the Registrar and to the Collector.
(3) A copy of such list along with notice shall also be sent to every member of the society by registered post.
(4) The notice referred to in sub-rule (2) and (3) shall clearly lay down that any objections or suggestions in respect of the provisional list may be sent by any person to the Secretary or where there is no post of Secretary, to the Chief Executive Officer of the society within a period of 15 days from the date on which the provisional list is displayed on the notice board of the office of the society.
(5) Any member of the society may bring to the notice of the society any omission or error in respect of the name or address or other particulars shown in the provisional list.
(6) Any person raising any objection or making a suggestion shall send such objection or suggestion with grounds therefor in writing within 15 days from
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
the date on which the provisional list is displayed on the notice board of the office of the society.
(7) The society shall after considering every objection, suggestion or any error in the provisional list indicated by any member under sub-rule (5), prepare the final list. The final list shall be displayed on the notice board of the office or sub-office of the society and a copy of such final list shall be sent to the Registrar and also to the Collector.
(8) Where the area of operation of a society is in more than one village, the number of constituencies shall be equal to the total number of seats excluding two seats reserved under sub-section (1) of section 74-B.
(9) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules and the bye-laws of the society, where the elections to the members of any Committee are scheduled to be held before the ending of the accounting year of the society, the delimitation of the constituencies shall be made by the Collector prior to the publication of the list of voters."
8.1 On perusal of the aforesaid Rule 3(A), it is
clear that notice is required to be issued for
inviting objections and suggestions in respect of
the provisional list which may be published for
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
the purpose of delimitation and after considering
such objections, order is required to be passed
under sub-rule (9) where the elections to the
members of any Committee are scheduled to be held
before the ending of the accounting year of the
society. Under sub-rule (9), the delimitation of
the constituencies shall be made by the Collector
prior to the publication of the list of voters.
Therefore, once the order dated 19.01.2023 is
passed by the respondent No. 2 under the
delegated power of Collector under sub-rule (9)
of Rule 3(A) of the Rules, 1982 prior to the
issuance of Voters' List, it is final order of
delimitation after objections are invited as per
prescribed procedure under Rule 3(A) of the
Rules, 1982.
8.2 Therefore, once an order is passed under Rule
3(A)(9) of the Rules, 1982, the same cannot be
considered as 'provisional order of delimitation'
as on bare perusal of the order dated 19.01.2023,
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
it is not in dispute that the said order is
passed under Rule 3(A)(9) of the Rules, 1982
after compliance of Rule 3(A)(2) to 3(A)(8) of
the Rules, 1982.
8.3 In the facts and circumstances of the case,
following observations made by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Rajkot District
Cooperative Bank Ltd. (supra) are relevant:
"17.On a careful examination of Rule 3-A (8) of the Rules by us, it is made clear that the said provision is aimed at geographical i.e. territory or zone wise bifurcation or division. A salient feature of the Rule 3-A is the delimitation of the constituencies which includes all specified cooperative societies. Once the area of operation of any society is more than one village, Sub rule (8) would come into play and the requirement of the number of constituencies would be equal to the total number of seats, excluding two seats reserved for the categories as provided under section 74-B of the Act.
18. Further, the language of sub rule (9) of Rule 3-A, makes it clear that the rule making authority has graced the Collector with the power to delimit the constituency/constituencies prior to the
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
publication of the voters list. The delimitation of the constituency/ constituencies should be prior to the preparation of the voters' list and/or in any case simultaneous with the preparation of voters' list but the voters list has to be as per the delimitation of the constituencies. The same is the case when the delimitation of the constituency is required to be made by the Collector prior to the publication of the list of voters.
19. Thus, when sub-rule (8) is read along with sub-rule (9) of Rule 3-A, where the society has the area of operation exceeding one village, even if the bye laws provide for single constituency, the seats provided by the bye laws has to be equal to the number of constituency/constituencies and therefore, for each seat, a separate constituency would be required to be delimited and if not so delimited by the society, of its own, it would be required for the Collector to exercise his power under sub rule (9) of Rule 3-A of the Rules for the delimitation of the constituency in accordance with the mandate of sub rule (8) of Rule 3-A and thereafter, the process for publication of the voters' list is to be given effect to.
20. The power conferred with the Collector for the delimitation of the constituency under sub rule (9) is independent and separate and only applicable in the case when the election of the members of any Management Committee of specified society is
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
scheduled to be held. Further, as specified in the sub rule (9) of Rule 3- A, such powers are to be exercised by the Collector, notwithstanding anything contained in the bye laws of such society. The Collector has to exercise the power for delimitation of the constituencies prior to the publication of the list of voters. Further, as rightly stated by the High Court in the impugned judgment that when a specific power is conferred in a specific contingency to a different authority, such power has to be read in addition to the general power for the amendment in the bye-laws. Thus, the bye-laws of any society have to be in conformity with the provisions of the Act and the Rules."
8.4 The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in paragraph 18 of
the aforesaid decision, has held that the
language of sub-rule (9) of Rule 3-A makes it
clear that the Collector is required to pass an
order of delimitation of the constituencies prior
to the publication of Voters' List or at least in
any case, simultaneously to the preparation of
the Voters' List. But Voters' List has to be as
per the delimitation of the constituencies.
Therefore, in view of the above settled legal
C/SCA/2233/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 15/02/2023
position read with Rule 3(A) of the Rules, 1982,
the Deputy Collector has no jurisdiction or power
to review his own order passed under Rule 3(A)(9)
of the Rules, 1982.
9. In view of the forgoing reasons, the impugned
dated 06.02.2023 being illegal and not tenable is
hereby quashed and set aside and the election is
directed to be held as per the delimitation order
dated 19.01.2023. The respondent No. 2 is
directed to issue a fresh schedule of election to
be held as per the delimitation order dated
19.01.2023 after publishing Voters' List on the
basis of the delimitation order dated 19.01.2023.
Such exercise shall be completed within a period
of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of
this order. Rule is made absolute to the
aforesaid extent with no order as to costs.
[ BHARGAV D. KARIA, J. ] hiren /15
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!