Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Botad Nagarpalika vs Hanshaben B Desani
2023 Latest Caselaw 8481 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8481 Guj
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023

Gujarat High Court

Botad Nagarpalika vs Hanshaben B Desani on 6 December, 2023

Author: N.V.Anjaria

Bench: N.V.Anjaria

                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




       C/LPA/1314/2023                             ORDER DATED: 06/12/2023

                                                                                   undefined




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                 R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1314 of 2023
              In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8334 of 2012
                                    With
                 CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 2 of 2023
                In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1314 of 2023
==========================================================
                          BOTAD NAGARPALIKA
                                Versus
                          HANSHABEN B DESANI
==========================================================
Appearance:
HARSHESH R KAKKAD(7813) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA
           and
           HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHEEKATI
           MANAVENDRANATH ROY

                             Date : 06/12/2023

                        ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Harshesh R. Kakkad for the appellant- Nagarpalika and learned advocate Mr. D.G. Shukla for the respondent- workman.

2. Preferred by the Nagarpalika, this Letters Patent Appeal arises out of common judgment and order dated 13.09.2022 of learned Single Judge in so far as the decision relates to Special Civil Application No. 8334 of 2012. Learned Single Judge directed Municipality to pay lump sum compensation of Rs.3 Lakhs to the petitioner.








                                                                                     NEUTRAL CITATION




      C/LPA/1314/2023                                ORDER DATED: 06/12/2023

                                                                                     undefined




3. The Reference (IT) No.103 of 1998 of the respondent workman, came to be rejected by the Industrial Tribunal by judgment and order dated 12.04.2012. The respondent workman was a peon under first party employer. The workman filed the statement of claim (Exh.7) and sought relief for regularization from the date of entry in service and to extend the resultant service benefits.

4. It was the case that though she was discharging the duties of a permanent nature, she was kept in service as daily-rated employee by paying the minimum wages and that thereby the employer deprived the workman of permanency by indulging into unfair labour practice. The first party employer filed its reply ( Exh.19) to take a stand that the employee was a daily rated workman and was employed depending upon the availability of work. It was contended that she was not a regularly selected employee, not entitled to regularization.

4.1 The reference came to be rejected by the Industrial Tribunal observing inter alia that the workman had entered into service on 5.1.1998, she obtained ex parte interim stay against the employer and continued in service. It was this aspect which weighed with the Industrial Tribunal to dismiss the reference.

5. Reckoned from the date of entry in service, the workman, in any case, continued to serve the first party employer- theMunicipality for more than 20 years.



5.1      Learned Single Judge in paragraph 4.5 of the order noticed the





                                                                                     NEUTRAL CITATION




      C/LPA/1314/2023                                ORDER DATED: 06/12/2023

                                                                                     undefined




sanction set up of the Municipality to come to conclusion in paragraph 10 that total 59 posts were vacant and at least 7 posts of peon were vacant.

5.2 Though the findings were recorded in favour of the workman, there was no question of reinstating her as she has already retired. Taking note of the aspect that the workman retired after rendering long services, and taking into account the overall circumstances, Rs.3 Lakhs was awarded to the petitioner towards lumpsum compensation.

6. The length of service, the nature of post, the status of workman and time which has elapsed till granting of relief are relevant factors, on the basis of which the court may advert to grant relief of payment of lump sum compensation in lieu of the relief of reinstatement. Noticing the relevant facts, this court does not find any error on part of the learned Single Judge to pay to the petitioner amount of Rs.3 Lakhs towards compensation.

7. The appeal lacks merit since no error can be booked in the judgment and order of learned Single Judge. The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed.

As the appeal is dismissed, the Civil Application will not survive.

(N.V.ANJARIA, J)

(CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J) C.M. JOSHI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter