Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prakashchand Sajjanraj Chhajed vs State Of Gujarat
2023 Latest Caselaw 8452 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8452 Guj
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023

Gujarat High Court

Prakashchand Sajjanraj Chhajed vs State Of Gujarat on 6 December, 2023

                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




     R/CR.MA/13579/2023                            ORDER DATED: 06/12/2023

                                                                                 undefined




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 13579
                          of 2023

                    In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2697 of 2023
                                    With
                      R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2697 of 2023
==========================================================
                     PRAKASHCHAND SAJJANRAJ CHHAJED
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
YUVRAJ G THAKORE(7785) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS VRUNDA C SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

                            Date : 06/12/2023
                          COMMON ORAL ORDER

ORDER IN CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION:

1. This is an application by the applicant - original

complainant under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973, seeking leave of this Court to present an

appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated

23.05.2023 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate

Special Negotiable Instrument Court No.36, Ahmedabad in

Criminal Case No.3700293 of 2015.

2. Heard, learned advocates appearing for respective

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/13579/2023 ORDER DATED: 06/12/2023

undefined

parties and perused the impugned judgment and order of the

trial Court.

3. Mr. Yuvraj Thakore, learned advocate for the applicant

submits that the complainant was having another two sister

concern firms, which are also in the business of finance and

making finance to the respondent accused in the year 2010,

after clearing the dues of the sister concern, present

complainant make a finance to the respondent accused in the

year 2012 and for which, learned advocate relies on the

Exh.16, from where, it transpired that the amount of

Rs.1,25,000/- was received by the respondent - accused from

the Chhajed Motors and signature was also made on the said

receipt, which was part of the compilation at Page-31.

Learned advocate further drawn attention of this Court to

receipt issued by the Angadia Pedhi, which were produced

below Exh.43, 44, 45 & 46 showing that after 2012, the

amount was paid to the Chhajed Motors in the year 2015

around Rs.65,000/-. Learned advocate further relies on the

sale agreement, which was executed by the respondent -

accused with the third party, wherein also, the reference of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/13579/2023 ORDER DATED: 06/12/2023

undefined

the amount of-course with regard to sister concern was made

by the respondent - accused. Learned advocate further

submits that the judgment and order passed by the learned

trial Court on the ground that there was no any dues with

regard to the loan given by the complainant. Learned

advocate further submits that there was signature on the

cheque as well as issuance of the cheque was not disputed by

the respondent - accused, neither through any evidence nor

through any circumstance. The another ground, which was

given for acquittal by the learned trial Court is that the

complainant has failed to prove that he is the proprietor of the

Chhajed Motors. Learned advocate draws the attention of this

Court with regard to the certificate issued by the bank below

Exh.57 showing that the account was open with the Uco Bank

in the name of Chhajed Motors and the name of the

complainant was mentioned as a Proprietor. Learned advocate

further submits that though the presumption, which is in

favour of the complainant under Sections-118 and 139 of the

N.I. Act, was not rebutted by the accused, the learned trial

Court had passed the judgment and order of acquittal and

therefore, it was prayed to allow the Leave to prefer an

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/13579/2023 ORDER DATED: 06/12/2023

undefined

Appeal and admit the criminal appeal.

4. Considering the avernments made in the application and

submissions made by the learned advocates appearing for the

respective parties, this Court finds that there is some

arguable case in favour of the applicant, therefore, leave, as

prayed for, is granted. This application is allowed. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPEAL:

1. The appeal is admitted. Learned APP waives service of

notice of admission on behalf of respondent - State.

2. Issue bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees

Five Thousand only) against the respondent - original

accused.

3. Record and proceedings be called for from the

concerned court. Registry is directed to list the Criminal

Appeal in seriatim.

(M. K. THAKKER,J) A. B. VAGHELA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter