Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6230 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2023
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10497/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/08/2023
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10497 of 2022
==========================================================
MUHAMMEDAAMIR ATAURRAHMANA ABDULRAHIM MACHHALIYA
Versus
JUBEDABEN D/O VALIBHAI ALIJIBHAI
==========================================================
Appearance:
UMARFARUK M KHARADI(8155) for the Petitioner(s) No.
1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
MR JEET J BHATT(6154) for the Respondent(s) No. 5
MR MAKBUL I MANSURI(2694) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
MS SABINA M MANSURI(3631) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for the Respondent(s) No. 4
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
Date : 24/08/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge judgment and order dated 25.4.2022 passed by the learned 6 th Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Palanpur in AO (Misc. Civil Appeal) No.16 of 2021, whereby the learned first appellate Court allowed the said AO (Misc. Civil Appeal) and quashed and set aside order passed below application Exh.5 in Regular Civil Suit No.43 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Palanpur. The effect of the impugned order is quashing and setting aside the injunction granted by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge.
2. The petitioners herein are the original plaintiffs and the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10497/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/08/2023
undefined
respondents herein are the original defendants.
3. Learned advocate Mr. MI Mansuri for the contesting respondents i.e. Jubedaben Valibhai and Mariamben Abdullahbhai made unequivocal statement before this Court that till Exh.5 application is decided afresh by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Palanpur, the respondents herein - original defendants shall not carry any construction over the disputed property and shall continue to maintain status quo as on date qua structure and possession over the dispute property till then.
4. The statement made herein has been taken on record and recorded. In view of said statement on record, present petition is required to be disposed of.
5. At this juncture, learned advocate Mr. Mansuri requests this Court to expedite afresh hearing of Exh.5 application. Record also indicates that various applications are pending before the learned trial Court for hearing, which is reflected from the impugned order i.e. mainly applications Exhs.22, 23, 28 and
30.
6. For the foregoing reasons, present petition is disposed of. The learned trial Court is hereby directed to decide injunction application Exh.5 afresh as early as possible, but not less than 60 days from the receipt of this order. The learned trial Court shall also decide other applications stated herein above within same time period. Both the parties, as agreed, shall cooperate the learned trial Court in expeditious disposal of the matter. Learned Principal District Judge shall ensure disposal of the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10497/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/08/2023
undefined
applications within time bound manner.
7. Needless to say that while deciding injunction application Exh.5 and other applications, the learned trial Court shall not be influenced by its order below Exh.5 application at earlier point of time nor any observations made while allowing the AO (Misc. Civil Appeal) or disposal of this petition. Notice discharged. Direct service is permitted.
(J. C. DOSHI,J) SHEKHAR P. BARVE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!