Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5925 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2023
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/13585/2019 ORDER DATED: 11/08/2023
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 13585 of 2019
==========================================================
SANJAYKUMAR RAMCHANDRA BAROT
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MANOJ T DANAK(6264) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR SOAHAM JOSHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT
Date : 11/08/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of present application, under Section 482
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant seeks
quashment of the impugned FIR being C.R.-II No.3010 of
2018 registered with the Himatnagar 'A' Division Police
Station, District : Sabarkantha for the offences punishable
under Section 229(A) of the Indian Penal Code as well as
the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that
the applicant was not remained present in the proceedings
being Criminal Case No.1023 of 2000 pending before the
Court concerned and thereby committed an offence by
jumping the conditions of the bail bond.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/13585/2019 ORDER DATED: 11/08/2023
undefined
3. Heard learned advocates. Rule. Learned APP
waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent -
State.
4. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that
the allegation on the applicant that the applicant was not
remained present inspite of repeated reminders in the Court
proceedings being Criminal Case No.1023 of 2000 pending
before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himatnagar and
thereby jumped the conditions of the bail bond. He has
submitted that the said proceedings are quashed by the Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated
13.02.2019 recorded on Criminal Misc. Application No.16334 of
2017. He has submitted that in view of the said disposal of
the main proceedings, the impugned complaint would not
stand any further. He has submitted that this application
may be allowed.
5. Learned APP for the State fairly submits that the
main proceedings from which the impugned FIR is arisen are
quashed by this Court. He has submitted that appropriate
order may be passed.
6.1 I have heard learned advocates for the respective
parties. I have considered the material on record. From
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/13585/2019 ORDER DATED: 11/08/2023
undefined
record, it transpires that the main proceeding being Criminal
Case No.1023 of 2000 was qua Sections 420 and 114 of the
Indian Penal Code for the offence under the Negotiable
Instruments Act and was between other persons in which the
applicant stood as a guarantor and has given bail bond. In
the said proceeding, the applicant was not remained present
and therefore, the impugned FIR against the applicant under
Section 229(A) of the Indian Penal Code by the Registrar of
the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himatnagar where
the original proceeding is pending.
6.2 The accused of the applicant of original case has
preferred Criminal Misc. Application No.16334 of 2017 before
this Court for quashment of the said proceedings, wherein
the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has, vide judgment and
order dated 13.02.2019, quashed the main proceedings being
Criminal Case No.1023 of 2000.
6.3 In view of above, no fruitful purpose would be
served to continue with the impugned FIR as well as the
proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR. This application
therefore needs to be allowed and the impugned FIR as well
as the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR, if any,
also need to be quashed.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/13585/2019 ORDER DATED: 11/08/2023
undefined
7. For the reasons recorded above, this application is
allowed. The impugned FIR being C.R.-II No.3010 of 2018
registered with the Himatnagar 'A' Division Police Station,
District : Sabarkantha is hereby quashed and set aside, qua
the applicant only. Consequently, the proceedings arising out
of the impugned FIR, if any, are also hereby quashed and
set aside, qua the applicant only. Rule is made absolute
accordingly. Direct service is permitted.
(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) M.H. DAVE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!