Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravirajsinh @ Ravi Gumansinh ... vs State Of Gujarat
2022 Latest Caselaw 8373 Guj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8373 Guj
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2022

Gujarat High Court
Ravirajsinh @ Ravi Gumansinh ... vs State Of Gujarat on 23 September, 2022
Bench: Nirzar S. Desai
     R/CR.MA/13256/2022                           ORDER DATED: 23/09/2022




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 13256 of 2022

==========================================================
                   RAVIRAJSINH @ RAVI GUMANSINH JADEJA
                                   Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. N. D. NANAVATY, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MR PREMAL S
RACHH(3297) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS. M. D. MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                              Date : 23/09/2022

                               ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. N. D. Nanavaty with learned advocate Mr. Premal S. Rachh for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. M. D. Mehta for the respondent - State.

2. This application is filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in connection with FIR registered at C.R.No. 11202057220168 of 2022 with Sikka Police Station, District - Jamnagar for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 427 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135 (1) of the Gujarat Police Act.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that, the

R/CR.MA/13256/2022 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2022

applicant is not involved in commission of offence as alleged in the FIR and therefore, looking to the role of the applicant and nature of the allegations, the applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable terms and conditions.

4. On the other hand, learned APP appearing for the respondent -

State opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations, this Court is of the opinion that, discretion is required to be exercised to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. This Court has considered the following facts while exercising discretion in favour of the applicant :-

[a] The applicant is in jail since 26.04.2022.

[b] Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed.

[c] Though the offence is under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, as per the FIR itself, the present applicant was carrying sword and he had given blow on the lower part of the legs which is a non vital part of the body.

[d] Learned Senior Advocate Mr. N. D. Nanavaty for the applicant points out that all other three co-accused who are named in the FIR are released by the Coordinate Bench of this Court.

R/CR.MA/13256/2022 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2022

[e] The aforesaid facts is substituted and by common order passed in respect of the bail application preferred by Jafar Vasha and Ravirajsinh Ghelubha Ker who have been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.06.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 10791 of 2022, the order is produced on record.

[f] According to learned Senior Advocate Mr. Nanavaty, Jayrajsinh Gumansinh Jadeja has been released by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.09.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.15394 of 2022.

[g] Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Nanavaty has submitted that though there are seven antecedents against the present applicant in respect of other co-accused, there were more than seven antecedents, yet the Coordinate Bench has considered his case whereas out of seven antecedents, the present applicant has already been acquitted in respect of an offence registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by way of judgment dated 29.10.2021 passed by the 3 rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar below Exh. 252 in Sessions Case No. 15 of 2014.

6. In view of the aforesaid facts, without discussing the evidence in detail, this Court, prima facie, is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on

R/CR.MA/13256/2022 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2022

regular bail. Hence, present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR registered at C.R.No. 11202057220168 of 2022 with Sikka Police Station, District - Jamnagar on executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that the applicant shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[d] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[e] furnish the present address of residence along with the proof to the Investigating Officer concerned and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[f] mark his presence before the concerned police station in the first week of every month till the trial is over; [g] appear before the Investigating Officer concerned, as and when required for investigation purpose and attend

R/CR.MA/13256/2022 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2022

the Court concerned regularly.

7. The Authorities will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

8. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

9. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.

(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) VARSHA DESAI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter