Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7589 Guj
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2022
C/SCA/13776/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/09/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13776 of 2022
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE Sd/-
================================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed No
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? No
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy No
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question No
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
================================================================
VALABHAI KANABHAI KHER
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
MR DIPEN DESAI(2481) for the Petitioner(s) No.
1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
MS NIDHI VYAS AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 4
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Date : 06/09/2022
ORAL JUDGMENT
Rule. Ms. Nidhi Vyas, learned AGP waives service of
rule on behalf of the respondents.
2. The present writ petition is filed for the following
C/SCA/13776/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/09/2022
reliefs:-
"6(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, commanding the respondent No.2 - Director, Agriculture Marketing and Rural Finance to immediately publish notification under Rule 27 of the Gujarat Agriculture Produce markets Rules, 1965 with respect to elected members of Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mangrol and further be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to immediately declare and hold the elections of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mangrol within such stipulated time as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court.
(B) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 - Director, Agriculture Marketing and Rural Finance to declare the elections of Chairman and Vice Chairman of Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mangrol within such short time as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. The brief facts leading to filing the present petition are
that the petitioners herein are the elected Members of the
Agriculture Produce Market Committee ["APMC" for short],
Mangrol. The election to the Managing Committee of the
APMC was held and the results came to be declared on
26.4.2022 wherein the petitioners were declared to have
been elected. It is the case of the petitioners that though the
elections were held long back, the respondents are not
issuing the notification as mandated under Rule 27 of the
C/SCA/13776/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/09/2022
Gujarat Agriculture Produce Markets Rules, 1965 ["APMC
Rules" for short] and were further not declaring the elections
to the post of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the APMC,
Mangrol. The petitioners, thereafter, submitted a
representation on 4.7.2022 to the respondent No.2 to
immediately declare the election for the post of Chairman
and Vice Chairman. However, no action has been taken by
the respondents and therefore, the petitioners approached
this Court by way of present writ petition.
4. Mr. Dipen Desai, learned advocate for the petitioners,
submits that once the results of the elections to the
Managing Committee of APMC are declared then the
provisions of Rule 27 and Rule 31 of the APMC Rules come
into play and that the respondents are statutorily bound to
notify the result in Official Gazette and further call for a
meeting of such Market Committee to elect its Chairman
and Vice Chairman. It is further submitted that in the
present case, no such meeting has been called by the
respondent No.2 till date even though more than 4 months
C/SCA/13776/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/09/2022
have passed since the declaration of the results. He relies on
the judgments of this Court reported in 1996 (2) GLH 416 -
Thakore Sitaji Mohanji & Anr. v. The District Registrar, Co.op.
Societies & Dy. Director, Agricultural Marketing & Rural
Finance, Mehsana & Ors. and 1988 (1) GLH 27 - Kantilal
Rajhuram Thakkar v. The Director of Agricultural Marketing
& Rural Finance & Anr. in support of his case.
5. Ms. Nidhi Vyas, learned AGP for the respondents,
submits that the election to the APMC, Mangrol were held
on 25.4.2022 and the results came to be declared on
26.4.2022. She submitted that thereafter, immediately on
28.4.2022, the District Registrar sent the proposal to the
respondent No.2 for declaration of notification in accordance
with Rule 27 of the APMC Rules. She further submits that
in the interregnum period, an election petition came to be
preferred under Rule 28 of the said Rules by one Mr.
Karamta Ramabhai Virbhai before the Director, Agriculture
Marketing and Rural Finance by way of Appeal No.2 of 2022
challenging the election to the Agriculturist Constituency of
C/SCA/13776/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/09/2022
APMC, Mangrol. The said election petition is pending
hearing before the respondent No.2 and since the election is
under challenge as on date before the competent authority,
no further steps have been taken by the respondent
authorities.
6. Heard learned counsels for the parties at length and
perused the documents on record.
7. It is seen from the record that though the election to
the APMC, Mangrol came to be held and the results
declared on 26.4.2022, no further action has been taken by
the respondents. Rule 27 of the APMC Rules mandates the
publication of the names of the elected and nominated
Members of the Market Committee to be published in the
official gazette by the respondent No.2 as soon as may be
after the election. It is seen in the present case that the said
mandate has not been followed by the respondents for the
reasons best known to them. Further, Rule 31 of the APMC
Rules mandates that as soon as after the constitution of the
C/SCA/13776/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/09/2022
new Market Committee, the respondent No.2 or person
authorized on his behalf, shall call for a meeting of the
Market Committee for election of the Chairman and Vice
Chairman amongst its Members. Since no action has been
taken under Rule 27 and the subsequent action under Rule
31 is also pending in the present case. The judgments relied
upon by the learned advocate Mr. Dipen Desai are squarely
applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present
case. In both the judgments, this Court has overruled such
objections with respect to the pendency of the election
petition and directed the respondents to take necessary
steps for holding the election to the post of the Chairman
and Vice Chairman of the Committee and complete the
election process within the stipulated time. I am in
respectful agreement of the same.
Learned AGP Ms. Nidhi Vyas could not dispute the
ratio laid down in both the judgments.
8. In view of the above observations, the present Special
Civil Application is allowed. The respondents are directed to
C/SCA/13776/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/09/2022
take necessary steps immediately for issuing notification in
the official gazette as stipulated in Rule 27 and thereafter
call a meeting of the new Market Committee under Rule 31
of the APMC Rules to elect the Chairman and Vice
Chairman from amongst its Members within a period of 4
weeks from the date of receipt of the writ of this Court.
Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to
costs. Direct Service is permitted.
Sd/-
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.) KAUSHIK D. CHAUHAN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!