Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Alpeshbhai Vitthalbhai Parmar vs Jagrutiben Alpeshbhai Parmar
2022 Latest Caselaw 10231 Guj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10231 Guj
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2022

Gujarat High Court
Alpeshbhai Vitthalbhai Parmar vs Jagrutiben Alpeshbhai Parmar on 16 December, 2022
Bench: N.V.Anjaria
     C/CA/2180/2022                                   ORDER DATED: 16/12/2022




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2180 of 2022

                      In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 27309 of 2022

==========================================================
                       ALPESHBHAI VITTHALBHAI PARMAR
                                   Versus
                       JAGRUTIBEN ALPESHBHAI PARMAR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR BHUNESH C RUPERA(3896) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
SHAILI A SHAH(8832) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA
       and
       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT

                                Date : 16/12/2022

                        ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT)

This application is filed under Section 5 of the

Limitation Act by the applicant seeking to condone the

delay of 82 days, which is caused in filing the First

Appeal against the judgment and order passed by the

learned Judge, Family Court No.3, Ahmedabad in

H.M.P.No.1051 of 2015 dated 23.6.2021.

2. Rule. Learned advocate Ms.Shaili Shah waives

service of notice of rule for respondent.

C/CA/2180/2022 ORDER DATED: 16/12/2022

3. Heard learned advocates for the respective

parties. Learned advocate Mr.Rupera for the appellant

referred to the averments made in this application and

submitted that the delay is not intentional and the same

may therefore be condoned. Learned advocate Ms.Shah

for the respondent vehemently opposed for grant of this

application.

4. We have considered the submissions canvassed

by the learned advocates for the respective parties. We

have perused the reasons stated in the memo of

application and the cause for not preferring the appeal

within the period of limitation, more particularly,

paragraph nos.3 and 4 thereof. The sufficient cause is

made out by the applicant.

5. In that view, delay is condoned. Rule is made

absolute accordingly.

(N.V.ANJARIA, J)

(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) SRILATHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter