Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14896 Guj
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021
C/SCA/13510/2021 ORDER DATED: 22/09/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13510 of 2021
================================================================
VIJAYKUMAR JAGANNATH SADAMAST
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
MR YOGEN N PANDYA(5766) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,10,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(99) for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
Date : 22/09/2021
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate Mr.Yogen Pandya has submitted that due to inadvertence, the Union did not supply the names of Hamal at the time of deciding writ petition being Special Civil Application No.11016 of 1998 filed by the Gujarat Secondary Education Board. Thus, he has submitted that in the judgment dated 05.11.2015 passed in Special Civil Application No.11016 of 1998 the names of the petitioners, who are Hamal, did not figure and hence, they are not extended the benefits of the said judgment.
Issue Notice to the respondents returnable on 21.10.2021. Direct service is permitted.
(A. S. SUPEHIA, J) ABHISHEK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!