Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukeshkumar Maneklal Shah vs The Competent Authority
2021 Latest Caselaw 13953 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13953 Guj
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Mukeshkumar Maneklal Shah vs The Competent Authority on 14 September, 2021
Bench: Biren Vaishnav
     C/SCA/13099/2021                                      ORDER DATED: 14/09/2021




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13099 of 2021

==========================================================
                        MUKESHKUMAR MANEKLAL SHAH
                                  Versus
                         THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VIMAL A PUROHIT(5049) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
SHRENIK R JASANI(9486) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR MEET THAKKAR, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Respondent(s) No. 1,
MS MANVI DAMLE for MR MAULIK G NANAVATI for the Respondent(s) No.
2,
MR DEVANG VYAS, ASG for the Respondent(s) No. 3,
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.
       JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
       and
       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV

                                 Date : 14/09/2021

                         ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)

1. We have heard Mr. Shrenik Jasani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Meet Thakkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1, Ms. Manvi Damle, learned counsel for Mr. Maulik G. Nanavati, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 and Mr. Devang Vyas, learned ASG for the respondent no.3.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has pressed this petition only for applicability of Factor-2 to be applied while

C/SCA/13099/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/09/2021

finally calculating the award as the per compensation vide the judgment dated 12.09.2019 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in a group of Writ Petitions led by Special Civil Application No.8734 of 2019. He has further specifically submitted that the benefit extended in Paragraphs 19, 20 and 21 of the said judgment may be extended and applied in the case of the present petitioner. In other matters, the earlier award needs to be revised and a fresh award needs to be given in the light of the judgment dated 12.09.2019 referred to above which has since been affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and now the State and National Highway Authority of India are complying the same subject to fulfillment of the conditions for getting the benefit of Factor-2. However, it is more or less admitted subject to verification by the respondent - NHAI that the petitioner is and would be entitled to the benefit of Factor-2. It goes without saying that the benefit would be extended so long as the petitioner is entitled to and eligible for the same, depending upon the location. We direct that the decision to redetermine the compensation be taken in light of the judgment dated 12.09.2019, wherein we have also fixed eight weeks' time to the competent authority to make the award and further we have granted 21 days time to the National Highway Authority of

C/SCA/13099/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/09/2021

India to make necessary deposit so that the land owners may get the benefit at the earliest.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also sought liberty that the petitioner, if determination of rate of land by which the compensation is calculated, is not satisfied, he may have the liberty to avail the remedy available under the law for seeking enhancement. We make it clear that we are not curtailing any right of the petitioner available to him under law for claiming the highest compensation which he can get subject to availing the appropriate remedy in accordance to law and establishing his rights for higher compensation.

4. It has been pointed out by Mr. Thakkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader that the present petitioner has moved for redetermination of compensation before the Arbitrator under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956. It is thus submitted by Mr. Thakkar as also Ms. Damle appearing for NHAI that before the Arbitrator, the petitioner may not insist for Factor-2 claim or in the alternative the respondents may be permitted to apprise the Arbitrator of the said issue so that there is no further multiplicity or complication in the

C/SCA/13099/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/09/2021

proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would not insist for Factor-2 before the Arbitrator as he would be getting the benefit of Factor-2 under the present orders.

5. In view of the above, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the competent authority / Land Acquisition Officer under the National Highways Act, 1956 to give a fresh award in the above cases in the light of the judgment dated 12.09.2019 passed in Special Civil Application No.8734 of 2019 keeping in mind the directions contained in Paragraphs 19, 20 and 21 thereof within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order to the competent authority. We further direct that within 21 days from the date of award the National Highway Authority of India shall deposit the amount with the competent authority for disbursement to the petitioner.

(THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA, J)

(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) Maulik

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter