Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17048 Guj
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2021
C/CA/975/2020 ORDER DATED: 28/10/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 975 of 2020
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 41174 of 2019
==========================================================
PARISHAPPA MUDAPPA AWAGARI
Versus
SOHANLAL SAMPATRAM KORI
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR PARESH M DARJI(3700) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE NOT RECD BACK(63) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 28/10/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned advocate for the applicants. Mr. Vaibhav Goswami, learned advocate submits that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.2. There is no appearance on behalf of the respondent No.3 though served.
The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is preferred to condone the delay which is occurred in preferring First Appeal to assail the impugned judgment and award.
Considering the averments made in this application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute.
C/CA/975/2020 ORDER DATED: 28/10/2021
Registry is directed to accept appearance of Mr. Vaibhav Goswami, learned advocate on behalf of the respondent No.2.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J) SURESH SOLANKI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!