Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lh. Of Decd. Kanbi Devjibhai ... vs Thakkar Naranji Purshottam Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 16909 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16909 Guj
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Lh. Of Decd. Kanbi Devjibhai ... vs Thakkar Naranji Purshottam Of ... on 27 October, 2021
Bench: B.N. Karia
     C/SCA/13109/2018                                    ORDER DATED: 27/10/2021




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13109 of 2018

                                 With
        CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR VACATING STAY) NO. 1 of 2019
           In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13109 of 2018
==========================================================
         LH. OF DECD. KANBI DEVJIBHAI DHANJI OF VADVA
                             Versus
     THAKKAR NARANJI PURSHOTTAM OF GADHSHISA & 6 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI(1077) for the Petitioner(s) No.
1,1.1,1.1.1,1.1.4,1.2,1.3
MR SK PATEL(654) for the Petitioner(s) No.
1.1.1.1,1.1.1.2,1.1.1.3,1.1.2,1.1.3,1.2.1,1.2.2,1.2.3,1.2.4,1.2.5,1.3.1,1.3.2,1.3.
3
for the Respondent(s) No. 3.3,3.4,3.5
DS AFF.NOT FILED (R)(71) for the Respondent(s) No.
1,1.1,3,4,4.1,4.2,4.3,4.4,5,6,7
KUNAL M BHAVSAR(8166) for the Respondent(s) No.
4.1.1,4.1.2,4.1.3,4.1.4,4.2.1,4.3.1,4.3.2,4.3.3,4.4.1,4.4.2,5.1
NANAVATI AND CO.(7105) for the Respondent(s) No.
1.1.1,1.1.2,1.1.3,1.1.4,1.1.5,1.1.6
RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3.1,3.2,4.2.2,4.2.3,5.2,5.3
UNSERVED EXPIRED (R)(69) for the Respondent(s) No. 6.1,6.2,7.1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA

                               Date : 27/10/2021

                                 ORAL ORDER

ORDER IN SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13109 of

1. By preferring this petition, petitioner has prayed to quash and

set aside the order dated 30.06.2018 by learned Principal District

Judge, Kachchh at Bhuj below the application Exh-1/B-15 in Civil

Misc. Application No.14 of 2018 in I.R. No.673 of 2018 and allow

C/SCA/13109/2018 ORDER DATED: 27/10/2021

the present application.

2. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the respective

parties and the objections raised by learned advocate for the

respondents, it appears that present petitioners are the original

defendant Nos.1.1 to 1.3 (3). Regular Civil Suit No.34 of 1959 filed

by the respondent was allowed by the learned Additional Civil

Judge, Nakhatrana by judgment and decree dated 19.12.2017. It

appears that against the said judgment and decree passed by the Civil

Court on 19.12.2017, petitioners wanted to file an appeal, but they

failed to file it within prescribed time. It further appears that there

was a delay of 35 days in preferring an appeal, therefore, the present

petitioners filed Exh.1/B-15 in Civil Misc. Application No.14 of

2018 in I.R. No.673 of 2018, which was rejected. It further appears

that judgment and decree was passed on 19.12.2017 and petitioners

came to know about such judgment on 24.01.2018. As per the

submissions made by learned advocate for the petitioners, advocate

appearing from the petitioners was out of station as sister-in-law of

the advocate, who was conducting the case, was hospitalized at

Lucknow. Thereafter, advocate engaged by the petitioners along

with wife had to attend medical emergency at Lucknow, and

C/SCA/13109/2018 ORDER DATED: 27/10/2021

therefore, he had to visit his sister-in-law who was hosptialized at

Lucknow. It also appears that advocate appearing for the petitioners

returned back on 28.01.2018 from Lucknow. As he himself had ill

and was hospitalized at Bhuj, the circumstances beyond the control

on the part of the petitioners, they could not file an appeal within a

prescribed time limit i.e. up to 18.01.2018 but they were able to file

the appeal on 28.02.2018. Therefore, there was a delay of 35 days in

preferring the appeal against the judgment and decree passed in

Regular Civil Suit No.34 of 1959 on 19.12.2017. It also appears that

before the Trial Court, petitioners have produced necessary

documents such as Air Tickets from Ahmedabad to Delhi, Delhi to

Lucknow as well as test report issued by the Bhagat Laboratory in

favour of Mr. Mustaq Lothiya who was appearing for the petitioners

before the trial court. Prima facie, it appears that there was sufficient

reason that petitioners could not file their appeal before the District

Court in time as prescribed by under law of limitation.

3. For the reasons discussed above, present petition requires

consideration and same is allowed. Hence the order dated

30.06.2018 passed by learned Principal District Judge, Kachchh at

Bhuj below application Exh-1/B-15 in Civil Misc. Application

C/SCA/13109/2018 ORDER DATED: 27/10/2021

No.14 of 2018 in I.R. No.673 of 2018 stands quashed and set aside.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

4. Considering the pendecny of the suit since the year-1959, the

learned District Court shall expedite the hearing of the appeal likely

to be preferred by the present petitioners.

5. The order dated 27.08.2018 shall be continued for a further

period of two weeks from the date of passing of this order.

(B.N. KARIA, J)

ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 of 2019

In view of the order passed in Special Civil Appeal No.13109

of 2018, present application does not survive and accordingly,

disposed of.

(B.N. KARIA, J) SUYASH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter