Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16529 Guj
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2021
C/CA/4521/2019 ORDER DATED: 21/10/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4521 of 2019
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 33706 of 2019
==========================================================
HEMABEN W/O PRAFULBHAI ALIAS JAGDISH LALLUBHAI RATHOD
(HALPATI) AND D/O SOMABHAI RATHOD
Versus
ANUJ GOODS CARRIER C/O PROP DUSHYANT KUMAR
==========================================================
Appearance:
NISHIT A BHALODI(9597) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
RULE UNSERVED(68) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 21/10/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for the respondent No.2 - insurance company. Presence of respondent No 1 who happens to be owner of the offending vehicle is not necessary for the purpose of disposal of present application.
The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is preferred to condone the delay which is occurred in preferring First Appeal to assail the impugned judgment and award.
Considering the averments made in this application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J) SURESH SOLANKI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!