Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16193 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2021
C/SCA/14317/2021 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14317 of 2021
================================================================
NAGAR PRATHMIK SIKSHAN SAMITI
Versus
UMARBHAI JUSABBHAI RUNJA
================================================================
Appearance:
MR PREMAL S RACHH(3297) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR YOGEN N PANDYA(5766) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
Date : 13/10/2021
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate Mr.Yogen Pandya appearing for the respondent has placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Nadiad Nagarpalika vs. Hasmukhlal Motilal Soni and Ors., 2010 (2) G.L.H. 250 and has submitted that subsequent deposit of the amount before the Appellate Authority under the provisions of Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 cannot come to the rescue to the petitioner as it is mandatory as per the said section to pre-deposit the amount.
Learned advocate Mr.Premal Rachh prays for some time in order to go through the judgment.
At his request, the matter is kept on 29.10.2021.
(A. S. SUPEHIA, J) ABHISHEK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!