Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5802 Guj
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2021
R/CR.RA/377/2021 ORDER DATED: 10/06/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 377 of 2021
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 377 of 2021
=============================================
BHARATBHAI PREMDASBHAI CHARANDAS
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
=============================================
Appearance:
MR RUCHIT J VYAS(10687) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS.KRINA CALA APP(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 10/06/2021
ORAL ORDER
ORDER IN R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 377 of 2021
Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondent - State.
ORDER IN CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 1 of 2021
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondentState.
2. By way of prayer5(c) of this application, the applicantoriginal accused is seeking suspension of sentence imposed vide judgment and order dated 16.04.2021 passed by learned 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar passed in Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2019 confirming the conviction vide order dated 30.04.2019 passed by the learned 2nd additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhavnagar in Criminal Case No.4595 of 2007 and to release him on bail during the pendency of the aforementioned Criminal Revision Application.
R/CR.RA/377/2021 ORDER DATED: 10/06/2021
3. Mr. Ruchit J Vyas, learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant was on bail during the pendency of trial and also pending the appeal. He has submitted that the learned Magistrate has convicted the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/, in default, further simple imprisonment for 3 months.
4. Mrs.Krina Calla, learned APP for the respondent - State strongly opposed for grant of suspension of sentece.
5. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondentState.
6. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and having gone through the materials available on record as well as perused the impugned judgment, this Court is of the considered opinion that present applicant requires consideration and prayer in terms of bail is allowed. The sentence imposed by the judgment and order dated 16.04.2021 passed by learned 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar passed in Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2019 is hereby suspended pending hearing and final disposal of the Criminal Revision Application. The applicant shall be released on bail by executing fresh bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) and one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court on condition that he shall proceed with the Criminal Appeal as and when it may be listed, and he shall surrender his passport, if having, before the learned trial Court and shall not leave India without prior permission of this Court. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Direct service is permitted through emode.
(ILESH J. VORA,J) Manoj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!