Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharatbhai Nimeshbhai Parmar ... vs State Of Gujarat
2021 Latest Caselaw 3279 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3279 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Bharatbhai Nimeshbhai Parmar ... vs State Of Gujarat on 25 February, 2021
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
     R/CR.MA/12432/2014                                        ORDER



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO.                  12432 of 2014

=====================================================
  BHARATBHAI NIMESHBHAI PARMAR (LUHAR) & 5 other(s)
                        Versus
            STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 other(s)
=====================================================
Appearance:
MS. SHAILI A KAPADIA(3453) for the Applicant(s) No.
1,2,3,4,5,6
NOTICE SERVED(4) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS MAITHILI D MEHTA, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=====================================================
 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                          Date : 25/02/2021

                                ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Shaili A. Kapadia on

behalf of the applicants and learned APP Ms.

Maithili D. Mehta on behalf of the respondent­

State.

2. Learned Advocate Mr. Fouzan N. Soniwala submits

that he has instructions to appear on behalf of

the respondent No.2­original complainant.

Learned Advocate Mr. Soniwala further submits

that he has already filed his Vakalatnama on

behalf of the original complainant in the

Registry.

3. By way of this application, the applicant prays

R/CR.MA/12432/2014 ORDER

for quashing of the FIR bearing C.R.No.I­159 of

2014 registered with Varachha Police Station,

Surat for the offence punishable under Sections

498A, 323, 504 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code

and under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of the Dowry

Prohibition Act.

4. Learned Advocate Ms. Shaili A. Kapadia as well

as learned Advocate Mr. Fouzan N. Soniwala

jointly submits that said parties to have

dispute being husband and wife have settled the

dispute interse and whereas settlement deed

dated 10th February, 2021 is submitted by learned

Advocates, which is directed to be taken on

record. Considering the same, learned advocate

request that the complaint impugned in this

petition may be quashed by this Court.

5. Learned Advocate Mr. Soniwala also submits that

he has filed an affidavit of the respondent No.2

dated 18th February, 2021 wherein the facts of

settlement is mentioned and whereas he submits

that such affidavit has already been filed in

the Registry.

6. Considering the fact that the dispute which has

R/CR.MA/12432/2014 ORDER

resulted in filing of the impugned complaint was

matrimonial in nature and considering the

settlement between the parties which is

reflected in the settlement deed.

7. Learned APP Ms. Maithili Mehta strongly objects

to this application and submits that considering

the allegations levelled against the applicants

no interference may be made by this court in the

impugned complaint as well as criminal case.

8. Having heard learned advocates for the

respective parties, this Court is of the opinion

that looking to the averments made in the

affidavit filed by the complainant dated 18th

February, 2021 more particularly, since the

issue is resolved and that he does not wish to

proceed any further with the impugned FIR and

considering the judgments of the Supreme Court

in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab &

Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madan mohan

Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4

SCC 582, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported

in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors.

Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in 2014 (2)

R/CR.MA/12432/2014 ORDER

Crime 67 (SC), no fruitful purpose would be

served, if the complaint is proceeded any

further.

9. In view of the discussions and observations

above, the criminal complaint/FIR being No.C.R.

No.I­159 of 2014 registered with Varacha Police

Station, District Surat on 18th June, 2014 for

the offences punishable under Sections 498(a),

323, 504 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and

punishable under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of the

Dowry Prohibition Act and all consequential

proceedings arising therefrom is hereby quashed

and set aside qua the present applicant. Rule is

made absolute. Registry is directed to

communicate this order to the concerned Police

Station through Email immediately.

Direct service is permitted through electronic mode.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J)

Pallavi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter