Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Farid Ahemad Munnabhai Shekh vs State Of Gujarat
2021 Latest Caselaw 3222 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3222 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Farid Ahemad Munnabhai Shekh vs State Of Gujarat on 24 February, 2021
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
      R/CR.MA/12323/2020                                              ORDER




      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO.                        12323 of 2020

=====================================================
            FARID AHEMAD MUNNABHAI SHEKH
                        Versus
                  STATE OF GUJARAT
=====================================================
Appearance:
MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(3227) for the Applicant(s) No.
1,2,3
MR SURESHKUMAR M CHAUDHARY(9938) for the Applicant(s)
No. 1,2,3
MS ARTI MADANGOPAL RAJPUT(8254) for the Respondent(s)
No. 2
MS MAITHILI D MEHTA, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=====================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                           Date : 24/02/2021

                                  ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Sanjay Prajapati on behalf of the applicants, learned APP Ms. Maithili D. Mehta on behalf of the respondent No.1­State and learned Advocate Ms. Arti Madangopal Rajput on behalf of the respondent No.2­original complainant.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents.

3. By way of this application, the applicant prays for quashing of criminal complaint/FIR being C.R.No.I­11191007200879 of 2020 dated 23rd

R/CR.MA/12323/2020 ORDER

July , 2020 registered with Bapunagar Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 114, 324, 294(B), 506(2) of the India Penal Code and under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act.

4. Learned Advocate Mr. Sanjay Prajapati submits that after filing of the complaint impugned herein, the parties have settled the dispute interse and whereas no fruitful purpose would be served if the impugned complaint is permitted to proceed any further.

5. Learned advocate Ms. Arti Madangopal Rajput appearing for the original complainant submits that she has filed an affidavit to this regard at page No.15 of the present application. She submits that the complaint-Mohammad Ismail s/o. Mohammad Jamal Shekh may be permitted to join the meeting. Permission is granted.

6. Learned advocate Ms. Arti Madangopal Rajput has identified the complainant. The complainant has joined the meeting and upon inquiry by this Court, he confirmed the fact of settlement arrived between the parties and he further confirms that he would not have any objection, if the complaint is quashed.

7. Learned APP Ms. Maithili D. Mehta strongly opposed the present application and she further submits that the offences committed by the

R/CR.MA/12323/2020 ORDER

applicant are serious in nature and therefore, no indulgence may be shown.

8. Having heard learned advocates for the respective parties, this Court is of the opinion that while allegations levelled in the complaint against the applicant are serious, but looking to the averments made in the affidavit filed by the complainant dated 4th August, 2020 more particularly, since the issue is resolved and that he does not wish to proceed further with the impugned FIR and considering the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madan mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC), no fruitful purpose would be served, if the complaint is proceeded any further.

9. In view of the discussions and observations above, the criminal complaint being I­ C.R.No.11191007200879 of 2020 registered with Bapunagar Police Station, Ahmedabad dated 23rd July, 2020 for the offence under Sections 323, 114, 324, 294(B), 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and all consequential proceedings arising

R/CR.MA/12323/2020 ORDER

therefrom is hereby quashed and set aside qua the present applicant.

Rule is made absolute. Registry is directed to communicate this order to the concerned Police Station through Email immediately.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J)

Pallavi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter