Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 319 Gua
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2026
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010251102023
2026:GAU-AS:699
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3573/2023
CHIRAT RAM RABIDAS
S/O LATE CHURATH RABIDAS,
VILLAGE BHUTORDOLONI, PS AND PO BIHPURIA, DIST NORTH
LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM 784161
VERSUS
BAN HAZARIKA AND 5 ORS.
S/O LATE HEMA HAZARIKA
VILLAGE BHUTORDOLONI, PS AND PO BIHPURIA, DIST NORTH
LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM 784161
2:SRI DULU SHARMA
S/O LATE SUBHAN SHARMA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHOLPUR
PO DHOLPUR
PS BIHPURIA
DIST NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM 784165
3:SRI SANJIB DUWARA
S/O SRI PRAFULLA DUWARA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHOLPUR
PO DHOLPUR
PS BIHPURIA
DIST NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM 784165
4:SRI JYOTISH BORUAH
S/O LATE PURANDAR BORUAH
Page No.# 2/3
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHOLPUR
PO DHOLPUR
PS BIHPURIA
DIST NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM 784165
5:SRI TAPAN BANIYA
S/O LATE BUPARAM BANIYA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHOLPUR
PO DHOLPUR
PS BIHPURIA
DIST NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM 784165
6:SRI NITUMONI BORUAH
S/O LIKHESWAR BORUAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 3 NIMORI
PO DHOLPUR
PS BIHPURIA
DIST NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM 78416
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAUHAN, MR. P MAZUMDER,MR. A R SHOME,R
DEB,M. BORUAH,MR N ALAM
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
ORDER
Date : 21-01-2026
Heard Mr. S. Chauhan, the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant.
2. From the order dated 07.08.2024 it seems that the Lawazima Court has passed an order wherefrom it is seen that the service already completed on respondent nos. 1 to 6. But, till date no one has represented the respondents.
3. This is an application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of Page No.# 3/3
delay of 47 days in preferring the connected appeal against the order dated 26.05.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Lakhimpur in Misc.(J) Case No. 4/2023.
4. It is submitted by Mr. Chauhan that the present applicant/appellant was staying with his son at Ambala and also fallen sick during that period and when they came to know about the judgment there was a long puja vacation and thereafter he made a request to the engaged counsel for obtaining the certified copy. He further submitted that there is no willful negligence and laches on the part of the present applicant. But, due to the said unavoidable circumstances the appeal could not be be preferred within the period of limitation.
5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for both sides and also considering the grounds mentioned in the petition which is found to be reasonable and justified ground, the delay of 47 days in preferring the connected FAO against the order dated 26.05.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Lakhimpur in Misc.(J) Case No. 4/2023 is hereby condoned.
6. Registry is accordingly directed to number and register the connected appeal and to list list accordingly.
7. With the above observations, the present IA stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!