Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7209 Gua
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2025
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010038502021
2025:GAU-AS:12335
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1469/2021
KALANGPAR MALIBAGAN ANUSUCHITA JATI MATCHYA UNNAYAN
SAMITI
(NON GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
SHRI SANJIB DAS, SON OF SHRI PRABHAT DAS AGED ABOUT 42
YEARS,RESIDENT OF BARUWABARI, SONAPUR, PO AND PS SONAPUR,
DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY,FISHERY
DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006
2:THE JOINT SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FISHERY DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
4:THE DISTRICT FISHERY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
KAMRUP ASSAM
5:THE MANAGING COMMITTEE
BEJENI MALIBAGAN HIGH SCHOOL
PO HAHAORA
DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
Page No.# 2/4
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
6:THE SECRETARY OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE
BEJENI MALIBAGAN HIGH SCHOOL
PO HAHAORA
DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSA
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Advocates for the petitioner(s) :Mr. S Banik
Advocates for the respondent(s) : Mr. K Gogoi
Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam
Date of hearing & judgment :10.09.2025
JUDGMENT & ORDER(ORAL)
Heard Mr. S Banik, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. K Gogoi, the learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam, who appears on behalf of the State respondents.
2. The petitioner herein has approached this Court challenging the actions of the respondent Fishery Department in trying to settle the Khas Nagajan Meen Mahal, Kamrup which is a 60% category Fishery to the respondent No.6, which is a school and does not come within the ambit of Rule 13 of the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953. Being aggrieved by the non-passing of an interim order, the petitioner Page No.# 3/4
approached the learned Division Bench of this Court in WA No.95/2021 and the learned Division Bench by the order dated 19.03.2021 passed an order of stay of the order dated 15.02.2021 issued by the Joint Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Fishery Department and restrained the parties from handing over possession of the concerned Khas Nagajan Meen Mahal to the Management Committee of the School. The said interim order thereupon have been continuing for the last more than 4(four) years.
3. This Court enquired with Mr. K Gogoi, the learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate appearing on behalf of the Fisheries Department as to whether 60% Fishery can be allotted dehors Rule 13 of the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953.
4. Mr. K Gogoi, the learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam submitted that the mandate of Rule 13 of the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 is very clear that the same has to be complied with in respect to 60% Fishery. He submitted with due fairness that the impugned order may be set aside and liberty may be granted to the State to settle the Khas Nagajan Meen Mahal in accordance with the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953.
5. Taking into account the above, this Court sets aside the Page No.# 4/4
impugned order dated 15.02.2021 issued by the Joint Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Fishery Department.
6. Further to that, this Court grants the liberty to the Fishery Department, Govt. of Assam to settle the said Khas Nagajan Meen Mahal in accordance with the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 and specifically by following the mandate of Rule 13 of the said Rules.
7. With the above, the writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!